˟

Dictionary of the Bible

129

 
Image of page 0150

CHRISTIANITY

also the writings of that Apostolic group which moved in the immediate light of His manifestation as that was given not only in His life on earth, But in His death and resurrection and their extraordinary spiritual results.

(2) On the other hand, we must avoid the error of those who, when they insist on going 'back to Christ,' and demand the substitution of the Christ of history tor the Christ of dogma, assume that nothing that is super-natural can be historical, and that the Christ whom we find in the NT the Christ of the Incarnation and the Resurrection and the Atonement , the Christ who wrought miracles and claimed to be the Son of God, and was so accepted by those who had known Him in the flesh and subsequently knew Him in the Spirit is not the Jesus of history at all. To this it can only be said here that the reality of alleged supernatural facts, like the reality of any other alleged facts, depends upon the evidence, and is not to be ruled out by any presuppositions. Further, that while from the nature of the case there is a difference between the teaching of Jesus during His earthly ministry and the teaching of the Apostles regarding the risen Christ, the evidence of our Lord's own consciousness and history, even as we find it in the Synoptic Gospels, points to the correctness of the ApostoUc conclusions about Him. We therefore hold that whatever Christianity is, it is not what certain modern writers describe as 'the religion of Jesus,' but something very different; and that as it is not to be confounded with churchly dogmas and institutions, it is just as little to be identified with an ethical theism based on the beauty of Christ's character and the pure precepts of His Sermon on the Mount. The men who were first called Christians (Ac IV) had never seen Jesus or listened to His teaching, and the gospel that laid its grasp upon them and won for them this distinctive name was neither a bare repetition of the Master's teaching nor a mere exhibition of His perfect life. On the contrary, it was such a gospel as meets us in the Epistles of St. Paul and the sermons reported in Acts the gospel of One who not only lived a spotless life and spake as never man spake, but died for our sins and was raised again for our justification, and was thereby ' declared to be the Son of God with power. It is in accordance, therefore, with the original application of the name 'Christian' that in seeking for the meaning of the word 'Christianity' we should make full use of the Apostolic testimony regarding Christ.

1. As a religion appearing in history, Christianity had its historical relations and its historical roots, (a) It was related to all the old ethnic faiths, and to every religious experience of vision and longing, of striving and despair, that the soul of man had ever known. The modern study of Comparative ReUgion is enabling us to realize this as it has never been realized before; but the NT makes the general truth perfectly plain. God speaks to man in the visible world (Ro l^o). He writes His law on the natural heart (2"), He never leaves Himself without witness (Ac 14"). And on their part men grope through the darkness after God (Ac 17"), being dimly conscious of the truth that they are also His offspring (v."'). And so when Christ comes, He comes not only as the Light of the world (Jn S'^), but as the true Light which lighteth every man that cometh into it (1') a state-ment which implies that even apart from His historical manifestation in Judaea, the heavenly Christ was the Light and Life of all men, and that there is a sense in which a soul may be 'naturally Christian' as TertuUian said.

(6) But while Christianity was and is related to all the ethnic faiths, it was deeply rooted in the soil of the OT. In the pagan reUgions we find many anticipations of Christianity, but in Judaism there is a definite and Divine preparation for it. Law and prophecy, priest-hood and sacrifice all contributed directly to this result. St. Paul declares that 'the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ' (Gal 3^). The Evangelists

CHRISTIANITY

draw attention again and again to the fact, so evident to every discerning reader of Scripture, that the prophets were heralds of the Christ who was to come. The author of Hebrews shows us that the ministries of Taber-nacle and Temple were examples and shadows of Christ's heavenly Priesthood. In the Fourth Gospel we find Jesus Himself affirming that 'salvation is of the Jews' (Jn 4=2). and in that very sermon in which He sets forth the manifesto of His own Kingdom, He proclaims that He came to fulfil and not to destroy the Law and the Prophets of Israel (Mt 5").

2. But notwithstanding its historical connexions with the past, Christianity was o religion absolutely new. The pagan faiths, so far from explaining its origin, serve rather to reveal the world's great need of it. St. Paul seized on this truth when he saw in the altar at Athens inscribed ' To an Unknown God,' an uncon-scious appeal to the Christian missionary to declare the God and Father of Jesus Christ (Ac IT'^-). And even Judaism no more accounts for Christianity than the soil accounts for the mighty tree which springs out of it. While carefully relating Himself to Judaism, Jesus no less carefully discriminated between the permanent and the passing in its institutions. He claimed the right not only to give a fresh reading of its ancient laws (Mt S^i"- ^'ff), but even to abrogate certain laws alto-gether (vv.™- '^- *^). He set Himself not merely above 'them of old time' (Mt 5 passim), but above Moses (19"-||, 22Ma-||, Jn 6^-) and Solomon (Mt 12«||), Abraham (Jn 8™) and David (Mt 22>"'-\\). It was

.this freedom of Jesus in dealing with the old religion that astonished His hearers: ' He taught them as having authority, and not as their scribes' (7^"). More-over, His attitude of independence towards Judaism is illustrated by the opposition of the Jewish leaders to Himself. His condemnation and crucifixion is the standing proof that He and His religion did not grow out of Judaism by any process of natural evolution. St. Paul sets the immense difference between the two faiths in the clearest light by his contrast, so fully worked out in Rom. and Gal., between the Law of Moses and the grace of Christ. And very soon in the history of the early Church there came that inevitable crisis which decided that though Judaism had been the cradle of Christianity, it was not to be its nursing- mother (cf . Fairbairn, Christ in Modern Theology, p. 52) ; that Christianity was not a mere spiritualized Judaism, but a new and universal religion recognizing no dis-tinction between Jew and Greek, circumcision and uncircumcision, and seeing in Christ Himself the 'all in all.'

3. When, with the NT as our guide, we seek for the essential features of objective Christianity, the following characteristics present themselves:

(o) It is a revelation of God through the life and in the Person of Jesus Christ. Upon this the vast majority of those who call themselves Christians are practically agreed. 'God was in Christ' (2 Co S"); and in the human face of Jesus there so shone the brightness of the Eternal Glory (4») that he that hath seen Him hath seen the Father (Jn 14»). In His teaching Jesus re-vealed God to us as our Father in heaven; in His own tenderness and pity and boundless love for men He showed us what the heavenly Fatherhood really means. And so, as we read the Gospels, the assurance grows that in looking on the face of Jesus Christ we are seeing right into the heart of the invisible God.

There are those, however, who, while fiilly admitting all this, yet hesitate to reco^ize in the historical Jesus a peraonal revelation of the Divine nature in human form. For them Jesus as the R evealer has the worth of God without being Himself God. But this is not the Christ who is pre-sented to us in the NT; and if we fall short of the NT view of Christ, our Christianity will not be the Christianity of the NT. If, on the other hand, we take the Gospels and Epistles as our authorities, we must hold upon their evi-dence not only that ' God was in Christ,' but that He so

129