DEAFNESS
Jos
155
etc.),
the
'sea
of
the
Arabah'
(Dt
3"
4"),
the
'east
or
eastern
sea'
(Ezk
47",
Jl
2").
In
Arabic
it
is
known
as
Bahr
Lut,
'
the
sea
ot
Lot,'
a
name
which,
however,
is
more
probably
due
to
the
direct
influence
of
the
history
as
reiated
in
the
Koran
than
to
a
survival
of
local
tradition.
Somewhere
near
the
sea
were
Sodom
and
Gomorrah,
but
whether
north
or
south
of
it
is
not
settled;
the
one
certain
fact
about
their
sites
is
that
the
popular
belief
that
they
are
covered
by
the
waters
of
the
Lake
is
quite
inadmissible.
The
Dead
Sea
owes
its
origin
to
a
fault
or
fracture
produced
in
the
surface
of
the
region
by
the
earth-movements
whereby
the
land
was
here
raised
above
the
sea-level.
This
fault
took
place
towards
the
end
of
the
Eocene
period
;
it
extends
along
the
whole
Jordan
valley
from
the
Gulf
of
Akabah
to
Hermon;
and
it
may
be
taken
as
fairly
certain
that
the
general
appearance
of
the
Lake
has
not
radically
altered
during
the
whole
time
that
the
human
race
has
existed
in
the
world.
Round
the
border
of
the
Lake
are
numerous
small
springs,
some
bursting
actually
under
its
waters,
others
forming
lagoons
of
comparatively
brackish
water
(as
at
'
Ain
Feshkhak
on
the
western
side).
In
these
lagoons
various
specimens
of
small
fish
are
to
be
found
;
but
in
the
main
body
of
the
water
itself
life
of
any
kind
is
impossible.
Recent
observations
tend
to
show
that
the
surface
of
the
Lake
is
slowly
rising.
An
island
that
was
a
conspicuous
feature
at
the
N.
end
disappeared
under
the
surface
in
1892,
and
has
never
been
seen
since.
R.
A.
S.
Macalisteb.
DEAFNESS.—
See
Medicine.
DEAL.
—
A
deal
is
a
part
or
share.
It
is
still
in
use
in
the
phrase
'a
great
deal'
or
'a
good
deal.'
In
AV
occurs
'tenth
deal'
(RV
'tenth
part'),
the
Heb.
'issdrdn
being
a
measure
used
in
meal-offerings.
See
Weights
AND
MEAS0BES,
n.
DEATH.—
I.
IntheOT.—
1.
The
B.eh.
terra
maweth
and
our
corresponding
word-
'death'
alike
spring
from
primitive
roots
belonging
to
the
very
beginnings
of
speech.
One
of
man's
first
needs
was
a
word
to
denote
that
stark
fact
of
experience
—
the
final
cessation
of
life
to
which
he
and
the
whole
animated
creation,
and
the
very
trees
and
plants,
were
all
subject.
It
is,
of
course,
in
this
ordinary
sense
of
the
term
as
denoting
a
physical
fact
that
the
expressions
'death'
and
'die'
are
mostly
used
in
the
Scriptures.
2.
The
Scriptures
have
nothing
directly
to
say
as
to
the
place
of
death
in
the
economy
of
nature.
St.
Paul's
words
in
Ro
5™-
as
to
the
connexion
between
sin
and
death
must
be
explained
in
harmony
with
this
fact
;
and,
for
that
matter,
in
harmony
also
with
his
own
words
in
Ro
6^,
where
death,
the
'
wages
of
sin,'
cannot
be
simply
physical
death.
The
Creation
narratives
are
silent
on
this
point,
yet
in
Gn
2"
man
is
expected
to
know
what
it
is
to
die.
We
are
not
to
look
for
exact
information
on
matters
such
as
this
from
writings
of
this
kind.
If
the
belief
enshrined
in
the
story
of
the
Fall
in
Gn
3
regarded
death
in
the
ordinary
sense
as
the
penalty
of
Adam
and
Eve's
transgression,
they
at
any
rate
did
not
die
'in
the
day'
of
their
transgression;
v.«
suggests
that
even
then,
could
he
but
also
eat
of
'the
tree
of
life,'
man
might
escape
mortality.
All
we
can
say
is
that
In
the
dawn
of
human
history
man
appears
as
one
already
familiar
with
the
correlative
mysteries
of
life
and
death.
3.
From
the
contemplation
of
the
act
of
dying
it
is
an
easy
step
to
the
thought
of
death
as
a
state
or
condition.
This
is
a
distinct
stage
towards
beUeving
in
existence
of
some
kind
beyond
the
grave.
And
to
the
vast
mass
of
mankind
to
say
'he
is
dead'
has
never
meant
'he
is
non-existent.'
4.
Divergent
beliefs
as
to
what
the
state
of
death
is
show
themselves
in
the
OT.
—
(a)
In
numerous
instances
death
is
represented
as
a
condition
of
considerable
activity
and
consciousness.
The
dead
are
regarded
as
'
knowing
DEATH
ones,'
able
toimpart
information
and
counsel
to
the
living.
Note,
the
term
translated
'
wizards'
in
EV
in
Lv
19*'
2D«,
Is
8"
19'
really
denotes
departed
spirits
who
are
sought
unto
or
inquired
ot
'on
behalf
of
the
Uving.'
A
vivid
instance
of
this
belief
is
furnished
in
the
story
of
the
Witch
of
En-dor
(1
S
28).
So
also
in
Is
149-
i»,
where
we
have
a
graphic
description
of
the
commotion
caused
in
Sheol
by
the
arrival
of
the
king
of
Babylon,
a
de-scription
with
wliich
we
may
compare
the
dream
of
'false
Clarence'
in
Shakespeare's
Rich.
III.,
1.
4.
The
reference
to
the
dead
under
the
term
'gods'
(.eWhim),
as
in
1
S
28i3,
is
noticeable.
Whether
in
all
this
we
have
a
relic
of
ancient
Semitic
ancestor-worship
(as
e.g.
Charles
maintains
in
his
Jowett
Lectures
on
Eschatology)
or
no,
it
seems
to
represent
very
primitive
beliefs
which
survived
in
one
form
and
another,
even
after
the
stern
Jahwistic
prohibition
of
necromancy
was
promulgated.
They
may
also
have
affected
the
treatment
of
the
dead,
just
as
even
yet
there
are
usages
in
existence
amongst
us
in
regard
to
behaviour
towards
the
dead
which
are
probably
traceable
to
very
primitive
pre-Christian
ideas
and
beUefs.
(6)
Jahwism
might
well
forbid
resort
to
necro-mancers
with
their
weird
appeals
to
the
dead
for
guidance
and
information,
for
in
its
view
the
state
of
death
was
one
of
unconsciousness,
forgetfvXness,
and
silence
(see
Ps
88'2
94"
116"
etc.).
The
present
world
is
emphati-cally
'the
land
of
the
living'
(Ps
271=
116'
etc.).
Those
that
are
in
Sheol
have
no
communion
with
Jahweh
;
see
the
Song
of
Hezekiah
in
Is
38,
and
elsewhere.
Sheol
appears
inviting
to
a
soul
in
distress
because
it
is
a
realm
of
unconscious
rest
(Job
3'™-
)
;
and
there
is
nothing
to
be
known
or
to
be
done
there
(Ec
9'°).
It
is
true
that
here
and
there
glimpses
of
a
different
prospect
for
the
individual
soul
show
themselves
(e.g.
Job
IQ'^-
and
probably
Ps
16"");
but
the
foregoing
was
evidently
the
prevalent
view
in
a
period
when
the
individual
was
altogether
subservient
to
the
nation,
and
the
religious
concerns
of
the
latter
were
rigorously
limited
to
the
present
life.
(c)
Other
ideas
of
death
as
not
terminating
man's
existence
and
interests
were,
however,
reached
in
later
prophetic
teaching,
mainly
through
the
thought
of
the
worth
of
the
individual,
the
significance
of
his
conscious
union
with
God,
and
of
the
covenant
relations
established
by
God
with
His
people
(Jer
31;
cf.
Ezk
18).
'Thou
wilt
not
leave
us
in
the
dust.'
6.
Death
as
standing
in
penal
relation
to
man's
sin
and
unrighteousness
is
frequently
insisted
on.
That
this
is
something
more
than
natural
death
is
clear
from
such
an
antithesis
as
we
have
in
Dt
SO'*'
"
{'life
and
good:
death
and
evil'),
and
this
set
in
strict
relation
to
conduct.
Cf
.
the
burden
of
Ezk
18,
'
the
soul
that
sinneth
it
shall
die,'
with
the
correlative
promise
of
fife:
similarly
Pr
15'°.
All
this
points
to
some
experience
in
the
man
himself
and
to
conditions
outlasting
the
present
Ufe.
On
the
other
hand,
the
thought
of
dying
'the
death
of
the
righteous'
(Nu
23'°)
as
a
desirable
thing
looks
in
the
same
direction.
And
why
has
the
righteous
'
hope
in
his
death
'
(Pr
14'^)
?
6.
As
minor
matters,
OT
poetical
uses
of
references
to
death
may
be
merely
pointed
out.
'
Chambers
ot
death,'
Pr
7";
'gates,'
Ps
9"
(
=
state);
'bitterness
of
death,'
1
S
1582,
Ec
72s
;
'terrors,'
Ps
55«;
'sorrows,'
Ps
1163
(
=
man's
natural
dread);
'shadow
of
death,'
Job,
Ps.,
the
Prophets,
passim
(=any
experience
of
horror
and
gloom,
as
well
as
with
reference
to
death
itself);
'the
sleep
of
death,'
Ps
13'
(to
be
distinguished
from
later
Christian
usage);
'snares
of
death,'
Prov.
passim,
etc.
(
=
things
leading
to
destruction)
;
the
phrase
'
to
death,'
as
'vexed
unto
death,'
Jg
13';
'sick,'
2
K
20'
(=to
an
extreme
degree).
II.
In
the
Apochtpha.
—
The
value
of
the
Apocrypha
in
connexion
with
the
study
of
Scriptural
teaching
and
usage
here
is
not
to
be
overlooked.
Notice
e.g.
Wisdom
chs.
1-5,
with
its
treatment
of
the
attitude
of
the
ungodly
towards
death
('
Let
us
eat
and
drink,
for
to-morrow
we