MEDICINE
Jer
822
means
a
'bandager.'
The
writer
of
2
Ch
16'2
seems
to
take
the
extreme
view
that
it
was
a
sin
to
consult
physicians,
but
saner
ideas
are
represented
in
Sir
38'.
Still,
it
may
be
doubted
whether
medical
duties
were
not
usually
performed
by
priests
(as
in
early
Egypt),
at
any
rate
in
the
eariier
OT
times;
certainly
the
priests
had
the
supervision
in
the
case
of
certain
diseases,
e.g.
leprosy;
and
prophets
also
were
applied
to
for
medical
advice
(cf.
1
K
142
17",
2
K
4^^
20').
And
even
in
Sir
38"
the
physician
is
regarded
as
having
certain
priestly
duties,
and
the
connexion
be-tween
religion
and
medicine
is
seen
in
the
counsel,
given
in
that
same
chapter,
that
repentance
and
an
offering
shall
precede
the
visit
of
the
physician.
In
the
NT
we
have
St.
Luke
described
as
a
physician
(Col
4"),
and
a
somewhat
depreciatory
remark
on
physicians
V'l
i
in
M4
5",
which,
however,
is
much
toned
down
in
■
■
Lk
8".
It
is
therefore
probable
that
up
till
late
times
medicine
was
in
the
charge
of
the
priests,
whose
knowledge
must
have
been
largely
traditional
and
empirical.
The
sacrificial
ritual
would
give
them
some
knowledge
of
animal
morphology,
but
human
anatomy
can
scarcely
have
existed
as
a
science
at
all,
since
up
to
about
A.D.
100
the
ceremonial
objections
to
touching
or
dis-secting
the
dead
prevailed.
Thus
Bible
references
to
facts
of
anatomy
and
physiology
are
very
few
in
number.
Blood
was
tabooed
as
food
(Gn
9',
Lv
17")
—
a
highly
important
sanitary
precaution,
considering
the
facility
with
which
blood
carries
microbes
and
parasites.
A
rudimentary
embryology
can
be
traced
in
Job
10'°,
Ps
139"-
"
(cf.
Ec
11').
But
most
of
the
physio-logical
theories
adverted
to
in
the
Bible
are
expressed
in
language
of
poetry
and
metaphor.
On
the
whole,
however,
we
may
infer
that
the
Jews
(like
other
ancient
peoples)
regarded
the
heart
as
the
seat
of
mental
and
moral
activity
(exceptions
to
this
view
are
Dn
2*'
4'
7>),
the
reins
or
kidneys
as
the
seats
of
impulse,
aflection,
conscience
(Jer
\V
12^,
Ps
7»),
the
bowels
as
the
organs
of
sympathy
(Ps
40*,
Job
30").
Proverbs
about
physicians
seem
to
be
alluded
to
in
Mt
9'^,
Lk
4!",
Sir
38'.
Except
in
the
case
of
certain
diseases,
visita-tion
of
the
sick
is
enjoined
in
the
Talmud
(though
not
in
the
OT),
and
enforced
by
Christ
in
Mt
25'«.
2.
General
terms
for
disease.
—
The
words
'sick,'
'sickness,'
'sicknesses,'
'disease,'
'diseased,'
'diseases,'
are
of
the
most
frequent
occurrence,
though
they
are
not
always
used
as
the
tr.
of
the
same
words
in
the
original.
Sometimes
the
term
is
qualified,
e.g.
'sickness
unto
death'
(Is
38'),
'sore
sickness'
(1
K
17"),
'evil
dis-ease'
(Ps
41'),
'incurable
disease'
(2
Ch
212').
We
also
have
'infirmity'
three
times
in
the
OT,
in
Lv
12^
meaning
periodic
sickness,
in
Ps
771"
as
weakness
from
sickness,
in
Pr
18"
as
weakness
generally.
The
term
plague
is
sometimes
used
of
a
specifip
epidemic,
at
other
times
of
sickness
in
general.
'There
are
also
various
figurative
expressions
for
disease,
and
in
some
places
it
is
described
as
inflicted
by
the
angel
of
God,
e.g.
2
S
24'".
In
the
NT,
again,
various
Gr.
words
are
translated
by
'sickness,'
'disease,'
'infirmity';
the
allusion
in
1
Co
11™
may
be
to
mental
weakness,
and
in
Ro
15'
to
weakness
of
conscience.
Some
diseases,
e.g.
leprosy,
were
regarded
as
unclean,
and
those
suffering
from
them
were
excluded
from
cities.
But
in
general
the
sick
were
treated
at
home.
As
to
the
treatment
we
know
very
little.
It
is
possible
that
in
earlier
times
bleeding
was
not
resorted
to
be-cause
of
the
taboo
on
blood,
though
in
later
times
the
Jews
followed
the
universal
practice.
Pr
30"
has
been
supposed
to
show
a
knowledge
of
the
medicinal
use
of
leeches
;
but
this
inference
can
by
no
meahs
be
drawn
with
any
certainty
from
the
context.
3.
Specific
diseases.
—
As
a
rule
the
Bible
references
to
specific
diseases
are
general
and
vague;
and
even
where
we
find
concrete
mention
of
particular
ailments,
it
is
not
always
easy
to
decide
what
the
exact
nature
of
MEDICINE
the
maladies
was.
In
some
cases
the
symptoms
are
given,
though
sometimes
very
indefinitely.
In
Dt
28^2
a
group
of
terms
is
used
for
diseases
which
appear
to
resemble
each
other
in
the
fact
that
they
are
sudden,
severe,
epidemic,
and
fatal.
The
first
is
called
consumption.
This
may
be
phthisis,
but
more
probable
it
means
a
kind
of
wasting
fever,
characterized
by
weakness
and
ansemia,
often
of
long
duration,
and
perhaps
not
unlike
Mediterranean
or
Malta
fever.
The
same
word
is
used
in
Lv
26".
The
'consumption'
mentioned
in
Is
10*2
282*
AV
does
not
appear
to
be
a
specific
disease
at
all.
This
is
followed
in
Deut.
by
(ever;
the
same
word
in
Lv
26"
is
rendered
'burning
ague'
by
the
AV,
and
the
LXX
translates
it
by
the
Greek
word
for
'jaundice.'
Its
symptoms
are
given
in
the
passage
of
Lv.;
it
may
be
a
sort
of
malarial
fever
which
occurs
in
certain
parts
of
Palestine,
and
is
occa-sionally
accompanied
by
jaundice.
This
may
be
the
disease
alluded
to
in
Jn
i'"
and
Lk
4",
both
instances
at
Capernaum.
Then
comes
inflammation
(Dt
282'
EV,
LXX
ague).
This
may
be
ague,
or
even
typhoid,
which
is
common
in
Palestine.
Next
we
have
'ex-treme
burning'
(Dt
28^2
AV,
RV
'fiery
heat,'
LXX
'irritation');
either
some
unspecified
kind
of
irritating
disease,
or
erysipelas
;
but
this
latter
disease
is
not
of
frequent
occurrence
in
Palestine.
The
'sword'
(Dt
2822
XV,
RV
'drought')
may
be
a
form
of
disease,
or
more
probably,
like
the
next
two
words,
may
refer
to
a
destruction
of
the
earth's
fruits.
The
same
word
'sword'
in
Zee
11"
seems,
from
the
symptoms
de-scribed,
to
refer
to
a
wasting
paralysis.
The
descrip-tions
given
in
Ps
39",
Zee
1412,
Lv
26",
Ezk
242'
33'»,
Ps
38'
are
largely
figurative;
but
the
imagery
may
be
taken
from
an
attack
of
confluent
smallpox,
with
its
disfiguring
and
repulsive
effects.
It
seems
highly
probable
that
smallpox
was
a
disease
of
antiquity;
perhaps
the
sixth
plague
of
Egypt
was
of
this
character.
Allusions
to
pestilence
or
plague
are
exceedingly
common
in
the
OT.
Thus
at
least
four
outbreaks
took
place
among
the
Israelites
during
their
wanderings
in
the
wilderness,
viz.
Nu
11"
(it
has
been
suggested
that
the
quails
here
mentioned
may
have
come
from
a
plague-stricken
district)
14"
16*'
25'
(in
this
last
case
it
may
have
been
communicated
by
the
Moabites).
For
other
references
to
plague,
cf.
2
S
24",
2
Ch
21",
Ps
91'-
«,
Jer
21"
42",
perhaps
2
K
19".
The
bubonic
plague
was
the
periodic
scourge
of
Bible
lands.
It
has
but
a
short
period
of
incubation,
spreads
rapidly
and
generally,
and
is
very
fatal,
death
ensuing
in
a
large
proportion
of
cases,
and
nearly
always
within
three
days.
No
precautions
against
it
are
prescribed
in
the
Levitical
Code,
because
it
was
regarded
as
a
special
visitation
of
God.
As
the
plague
is
not
endemic
in
Palestine,
the
Jews
probably
incurred
it
by
mixing
with
their
neigh-bours.
The
emerods
of
1
S
5«
were
tumours
of
a
definite
shape,
and
may
therefore
be
the
buboes
of
the
plague.
The
tumours
appeared
somewhere
in
the
lower
part
of
the
abdomen.
Some
have
supposed
them
to
be
hemor-rhoids,
by
comparison
with
the
phrase
in
Ps
78",
but
this
is
doubtful.
The
same
word
occurs
in
Dt
282'.
Of
diseases
in
the
digestive
organs
the
casein
2
Ch
21"
is
one
of
chronic
dysentery
in
its
worst
form.
That
in
Ac
28"
(AV
bloody
flux)
is
also
dysentery,
which
is
very
prevalent
in
Malta.
The
mention
of
hsemorrhage
in
this
case
shows
that
it
was
of
the
ulcerative
or
gangrenous
type,
which
is
very
dangerous.
The
results
of
intemperance
are
mentioned
in
Pr
232«ii.,
Is
19'<.
The
liver.
The
Hebrew
physicians
regarded
many
disorders
as
due
to
an
alteration
in
the
bile
(cf.
Job
16",
Pr
72',
La
2").
The
disorders
alluded
to
in
1
Ti
62»
were
probably
some
kind
of
dyspepsia,
apparently
pro-ducing
lack
of
energy
(cf.
1
Ti
4"-");
the
symptoms
are
often
temporarily
relieved
by
the
use
of
alcohol.
In
Ps
69'
allusion
is
made
to
the
dryness
of
throat
pro-duced
by
mental
emotions
of
a
lowering
character;