NATURAL
was
intensified
by
the
jjaptivity
in
Babylon,
when
the
prophetic
and
priestly
instructors
of
the
exiled
Jews
taught
them
that
their
calamities
came
upon
them
on
account
of
their
disloyalty
to
Jahweh
and
the
ordinances
of
His
religion,
and
because
they
compromised
with
Idolatrous
practices
and
heathen
nations.
It
was
in
Babylon
that
Ezekiel
drew
up
the
programme
of
worship
and
organization
for
the
nation
after
the
Return,
laying
stress
on
the
doctrine
that
Israel
was
to
be
a
holy
people,
separated
from
other
nations
(see
Ezk
40-48).
Some
time
after
the
Return,
Ezra
and
Nehemiah
had
to
contend
with
the
laxity
to
which
Jews
who
had
remained
in
the
home
land
and
others
had
jdelded;
but
they
were
uncompro-mising,
and
won
the
battle
for
nationalism
in
religion.
Judaism
was
in
even
greater
danger
of
being
lost
in
the
world-currents
of
speculation
and
religion
soon
after
the
time
of
Alexander
the
Great.
Indeed,
but
for
the
brave
Maccabsean
rising
in
the
earlier
half
of
the
2nd
cent.
B.C.,
both
the
religion
and
the
language
of
the
Jew
might,
humanly
speaking,
have
perished.
The
Apocrypha
speaks
of
the
'
nations
'
just
as
do
the
later
writings
of
the
OT.
They
are
'uncircumcised,'
'having
sold
themselves
to
do
evil'
(1
Mac
1'=);
they
break
the
Sabbath,
offer
no
sacrifice
to
Jahweh,
eat
unclean
food
and
such
as
has
been
offered
to
idols
(2
Mac
gs.
3.
18
igif.
etc.
etc.).
The
NT
reveals
the
same
attitude
towards
foreign
nations
on
the
part
of
the
Jews
(see
Ac
10*'
et
passim).
In
Rabbinical
writings
Jewish
exclusiveuess
manifested
itself
even
more
decisively
(see
Eisenmenger,
Entdecktes
Judenthum,
vol.
i.,
esp.
ch.
xvi.).
But,
as
in
the
OT
a
broader
spirit
shows
itself
constantly,
culminating
fn
the
universalism
of
Christianity,
so
enlightened
and
broadminded
Jews
in
all
ages
have
deprecated
the
fanatical
race-hatred
which
many
of
their
compatriots
have
displayed.
T.
Witton
Davies.
KATTTRAL.
—
The
contrast
between
'natural'
(Gr.
psyckikos)
and
'spiritual'
{pneutnatikos)
is
drawn
out
by
St.
Paul
in
1
Co
lS«-<».
The
natural
body
is
derived
f^om
the
first
Adam,
and
is
our
body
in
so
far
as
it
is
accommodated
to,
and
limited
by,
the
needs
of
the
animal
side
of
the
human
nature.
In
such
a
sense
it
is
especially
true
that
'the
natural
man
receiveth
not
the
things
of
the
Spirit
of
God'
(1
Co
2").
Man
derives
his
spiritual
life
from
union
with
Christ
('the
last
Adam'),
but
his
present
body
is
not
adapted
to
the
needs
of
this
spiritual
existence;
hence
the
distinction
made
by
St.
Paul
between
the
natural
body
(called
the
'body
of
death,'
Ro
7")
and
the
spiritual
body
of
the
resurrection.
'The
transference
from
the
one
to
the
other
begins
in
this
life,
and
the
two
beings
are
identical
in
so
far
as
continuity
creates
an
identity,
but
otherwise,
owing
to
the
operation
of
the
union
with
Christ,
distinct.
T.
A.
MoxoN.
NATURE.
—
The
terra
'
nature'
is
not
used
in
the
OT.
nor
was
the
conception
current
in
Hebrew
thought,
as
God
alone
is
seen
in
all,
through
all,
and
over
all.
The
idea
came
from
the
word
physis
from
Hellenism.
Swine's
flesh
is
commended
for
food
as
a
gift
of
nature
in
4
Mac
5'.
In
the
NT
the
term
is
used
in
various
senses:
(1)
the
forces,
laws,
and
order
of
the
world,
including
man
(Ro
128
lia-
M,
Gal
4*);
(2)
the
inborn
sense
of
pro-priety
or
morality
(1
Co
11»,
Ro
2");
(3)
birth
or
physical
origin
(Gal
2"',
Ro
2")
;
(4)
the
sum
of
character-istics
of
a
species
or
person,
human
(Ja
3'),
or
Divine
(2
P
1<)
;
(5)
a
condition
acquired
or
inherited
(Eph
2',
'
by
nature
children
of
wrath
').
What
is
contrary
to
nature
is
condemned.
While
the
terra
is
not
found
or
the
conception
raade
expUcit
in
the
OT,
Schultz
{OT
Theol.
ii.
74)
finds
in
the
Law
'the
general
rule
that
nothing
is
to
be
permitted
contrary
to
the
delicate
sense
of
the
inviolable
proprieties
of
nature,'
and
gives
a
number
of
instances
(Ex
23i9
34»,
Lv
22's
19",
Dt
22'-",
Lv
10»
1928
21'
22M,
Dt
14'
23').
The
beauty
and
the
order
of
the
world
are
recognized
as
evidences
of
Divine
wisdom
NAZIRITE
and
power
(Ps
8'
19'
33»-
'
90'
104.
136»"-
147,
Pr
8K-8",
Job
38.
39);
but
the
sum
of
created
things
is
not
hypostatized
and
personified
apart
from
God,
as
in
much
current
modern
thinking.
God
is
Creator,
Preserver,
and
Ruler:
He
makes
all
(Is
44^,
Am
4"),
and
is
in
all
(Ps
139).
His
immanence
is
by
His
Spirit
(Gn
P).
Jesus
recognizes
God's
bounty
and
care
in
the
flowers
of
the
fleld
and
the
birds
of
the
air
(Mt
6»-
^');
He
uses
natural
processes
to
illustrate
spiritual,
in
salt
(5"),
seed
and
soil
(133-»),
and
leaven
(13M).
The
growth
of
the
seed
is
also
used
as
an
illustration
by
Paul
(1
Co
15"-
").
There
is
in
the
Bible
no
interest
in
nature
apart
from
God,
and
the
problem
of
the
relation
of
God
to
nature
has
not
yet
risen
on
the
horizon
of
the
thought
of
the
writers.
Alphed
E.
Gaevie.
NAUGHT.—
'Naught'
is
'nothing'
(from
A.S.
na
'not,'
and
wiht
'a
whit
or
a
thing').
Sometimes
the
spelling
became
'nought'
(perhaps
under
the
influence
of
'ought').
In
the
earliest
editions
of
AV
there
is
no
difference
between
'naught'
and
'nought';
but
in
the
ed.
of
1638
a
difference
was
introduced,
'
naught'
being
used
in
2
K
2",
Pr
20'<,
because
there
the
meaning
is
'
bad
'
;
'
nought
'
everywhere
else,
but
with
the
meaning
'
worthlessness.'
This
distinction
was
preserved
by
Scrivener,
in
his
Cambr.
Par.
Bible,
and
is
found
in
most
modern
English
Bibles.
'Naughty,'
however,
is
simply
'worthless,'
as
Jer
24=
'very
naughty
flgs.'
But
'naughtiness'
always
means
'wickedness,'
as
Pr
11»
'transgressors
shall
be
taken
in
their
own
naughtiness.'
NAVE.
—
The
form
in
which
(possibly
by
a
primitive
error
In
transcription
of
the
Greek)
the
Heb.
name
Nun
appears
in
AV
of
Sir
46'.
NAVY.—
See
Ships
and
Boats,
p.
849''.
NAZARENE.—
A
title
applied
to
Christ
in
Mt
2«
apparently
as
a
quotation
from
a
phrophecy
.
Its
significa-tion
is
a
matter
of
controversy.
Apart
from
the
primary
meaning
of
the
word,
'an
inhabitant
of
Nazareth,'
there
may
have
been,
as
is
often
the
case
in
prophetic
quotations,
a
secondary
meaning
in
allusion
to
the
Heb.
word
netser,
'
a
branch,'
in
which
case
the
reference
may
have
been
to
the
Messianic
passage
Is
11';
or
possibly
the
reference
may
have
been
to
the
word
nSisar,
'to
save.'
The
epithet,
applied
often
in
scorn
(cf.
Jn
1"),
was
used
of
Christ
by
demoniacs
(Mk
1«,
Lk
4M),
by
the
people
generaUy
(Mk
10",
Lk
18"),
by
the
soldiers
(
Jn
18=-
'),
by
the
servants
(Mt
26",
Mk
14"),
by
Pilate
(Jn
19"),
as
well
as
by
His
own
followers
on
various
occasions
(Lk
24"
etc.).
The
attempt
to
connect
the
word
with
'Nazirite'
is
etymologically
impossible,
and
has
no
meaning
as
applied
to
Jesus
Christ.
T.
A.
MoxoN.
NAZARETH
(mod.
en-Nasira).
—
A
town
in
the
north
border
of
the
Plain
of
Esdraelon.
It
was
a
place
of
no
history
(being
entirely
unmentioned
in
the
OT,
Josephus,
or
the
Talmud),
no
importance,
and,
possibly,
of
bad
reputation
(Jn
1«).
Here,
however,
lived
Mary
and
Joseph.
Hither,
before
their
marriage,
was
the
angel
Gabriel
sent
to
announce
the
coming
birth
of
Christ
(Lk
l!»-38)_
and
hither
the
Holy
Family
retired
after
the
flight
to
Egypt
(Mt
2P).
The
obscure
years
of
Christ
's
boyhood
were
spent
here,
and
in
its
synagogue
He
preached
the
sermon
for
which
He
was
rejected
by
His
fellow-townsmen
(Mt
13",
Lk
4^').
After
this,
save
as
a
centre
of
pilgrimage,
Nazareth
sank
into
obscurity.
The
Crusaders
made
it
a
bishopric;
it
is
now
the
seat
of
a
Turlcish
lieutenant-governor.
Many
traditional
sites
are
pointed
out
to
pilgrims
and
tourists,
for
not
one
of
which,
with
the
possible
exception
of
the
'
Virgin's
Well
'
(which,
being
the
only
spring
known
in
the
neigh-bourhood,
was
not
improbably
that
used
by
the
Holy
Family),
is
there
any
justiflcation.
R.
A.
S.
Macalisteh.
NAZIRITE
(AV
Nazarite).—
The
primary
meaning
of
the
Heb.
verb
naear
is
to
separate.
Hence
the
nasir