NOUGHT
of
offerings.
The
nose
is
the
organ
of
the
breath
by
wliich
men
live
(Gn
2'
etc.).
The
breath
is
easily
stopped
or
expelled,
hence
the
fact
signifies
the
tran-siency
of
human
Ufe
(Is
222).
Excited
breathing,
with
distention
of
the
nostrils
when
moved
by
indignation,
led
to
the
nose
being
used
fig.
for
anger
(Gn
27",
and
very
often).
Ezk
8"
refers
to
the
custom
of
putting
a
twig
to
the
nose,
apparently
in
idolatrous
worship,
the
significance
of
which
is
now
obscure.
For
'nose-ring,'
see
Ornaments,
§
2.
W.
Ewing.
NOUGHT.
—
See
Naught;
and
notice,
further,
the
phrase
'set
at
nought'
(Pr
l^s,
Mk
9").
'To
set'
is
'to
value,'
and
'nought'
is
'nothing,'
so
the
phrase
means
to
reckon
of
no
value.
NOVICE.—
In
1
Tl
3Mt
is
enjoined
that
the
bishop
must
not
be
a
novice.
The
Or.
word
(neophytos,
lit.
'newly
planted')
was
afterwards
used
in
the
technical
sense
of
one
who
has
not
yet
taken
reUgious
vows.
Here
it
is
general
—
one
newly
introduced
into
the
Chris-tian
community.
NHHBEB.
—
1.
Notation.
—
The
decimal
scale
of
nota-tion
was
used
by
the
Israelites,
Assyrians,
Babylonians,
Egyptians,
Greeks,
Romans,
and,
so
far
as
we
know,
by
the
other
nations
mentioned
in
the
Bible,
i.e.
they
reckoned
by
units,
tens,
hundreds,
etc.
2.
Variety
and
range
of
numerical
terminology.—
The
Heb.
language
expressed
the
integers
from
one
to
any
amount
by
words
denoting
units,
tens,
a
hundred,
two
hundred,
a
thousand,
two
thousand,
ten
thousand,
twenty
thousand,
and
by
combinations
of
these
words.
Thus
the
highest
number
expressed
by
a
single
word
is
twenty
thousand,
the
word
used
meaning
double
ten
thousand.
The
word
'millions'
in
AV
of
Gn
2^'
is
a
mistranslation;
it
should
be
'ten
thousands'
as
in
RV.
The
number
referred
to
in
this
verse,
'
thousands
of
ten
thousands,'
for
the
descendants
hoped
tor
from
Rebekah,
and
the
number
of
the
angels
in
Dn
7'°,
Rev
5",
'thousand
thousands
ministered
unto
him,
and
ten
thousand
times
ten
thousand
stood
before
him,'
if
taken
Uterally,
would
be
the
largest
numbers
mentioned
in
the
Bible,
but
they
are
merely
rhetorical
phrases
for
countless,
indefinitely
large
numbers.
In
Rev
T
the
redeemed
are
'a
great
multitude
which
no
man
could
number'
(cf.
Gn
13")
—
the
nearest
approach
which
the
Bible
makes
to
the
mathematical
idea
of
infinity.
The
largest
hteral
number
in
the
Bible
is
the
number
of
Israelites
fit
for
warlike
service,
ascertained
by
David's
census
as
1,100,000,
in
addition
to
the
men
of
Judah
470,000
(1
Ch
21').
In
2
S
24»,
however,
the
numbers
are
800,000
and
500,000
respectively.
Qose
to
this
comes
the
army
of
Zerah
(2
Ch
14»),
'a
thousand
thousand,'
i.e.
1,000,000;
and
in
2
Ch
17™-,
Jehosha-phat
has
an
army
in
five
divisions,
of
300,000,
280,000,
200,000,
200,000,
180,000
respectively.
The
number
of
fighting
men
amongst
the
Israelites
is
given
in
Nu
232
as
603,550;
and
later
on
in
Nu
26"
as
601,730.
Hebrew
also
possessed
a
few
special
forms
for
the
ordinals,
first,
second,
etc.,
and
to
denote
'seven
times,'
etc.;
in
other
cases,
especially
for
the
higher
numbers,
the
cardinals
are
used.
There
are
also
a
few
words
for
fractions,
'a
third,'
'a
quarter.'
The
Biblical
Greek
calls
for
no
special
comment;
the
writers
had
at
their
disposal
the
ordinary
resources
of
Hellenistic
Greek.
We
may,
however,
call
attention
to
the
disputed
rendering
in
Mt
1822,
where
RV
has
'seventy
times
seven,'
RVm
'seventy
times
and
seven.'
3.
Symbols.—
In
the
Heb.
text
of
the
OT,
and
also
for
the
most
part
in
the
Gr.
text
of
the
NT,
numbers
are
denoted
by
words.
This
method
is
also
the
only
one
used
in
the
two
ancient
Heb.
inscriptions
—
the
Moabite
Stone
(rather
later
than
Ahab),
and
the
Siloam
inscription
(usually
ascribed
to
the
time
of
Hezekiah).
As
the
Assyrians,
Egyptians,
and
Phoenicians
used
figures
as
well
as
words
to
denote
numbers,
it
is
possible
NUMBER
that
the
Israelites
also
had
arithmetical
figures;
but
at
present
there
is
no
positive
evidence
of
such
a
usage.
In
Isiter
times
the
Jews
used
consonants
as
numerical
signs;
the
units
from
one
to
nine
were
denoted
by
the
first
nine
letters,
the
tens
from
ten
to
ninety
by
the
next
nine,
and
the
hundreds
from
one
hundred
to
four
hundred
by
the
remaining
four
letters.
Other
numbers
were
de-noted
by
combinations
of
letters.
A
curious
feature
of
this
system
is
that
the
natural
combination
for
IS,
viz.
Yod=
10,
Hc=5,
was
not
used
because
'
Yod,
He'
or
Yah
was
a
form
of
the
sacred
name
Yahweh,
which
might
not
be
pronounced;
accordingly
Teth
=
9
and
Waw=6
were
substituted.
This
system
is
still
commonly
used
to
number
the
chapters
and
verses
in
Heb.
Bibles.
A
similar
system
was
also
used
by
the
Greeks,
and
is
occasionally
found
in
the
NT;
thus
the
Number
of
the
Beast,
666,
in
Rev
13",
is
written
by
means
of
three
letters.
4.
Arithmetic.
—
There
is
no
evidence
of
proficiency
in
arithmetic
beyond
the
simplest
operations,
but
we
have
examples
of
addition
in
connexion
with
the
census
in
the
wilderness,
the
numbers
of
the
separate
tribes
being
given
first
and
then
the
total
(Nu
l'^-
26™);
subtraction
is
referred
to
in
Lv
27";
an
instance
of
multiplication
is
Lv
258,
7X7
=
49;
and
Lv
25'"
impUes
a
kind
of
rule
of
three
sum.
B.
Round
Numbers.
—
As
in
other
languages,
'round
numbers,'
exact
tens,
hundreds,
thousands,
etc.,
must
often
have
been
used
by
the
Israelites,
on
the
under-standing
that
they
were
only
approximately
accurate;
and
in
the
same
way
smaller
numbers
were
sometimes
used
indefinitely
for
'a
few';
cf.
our
'half
a
dozen.'
For
instance,
the
exact
ten
thousands
of
Jehoshaphat's
armies
given
above
are
doubtless
round
numbers.
Again,
in
Lv
26*,
'five
of
you
shall
chase
a
hundred,'
merely
means,
'a
handful
of
you
shall
put
to
fiight
many
times
your
own
number.'
This
indefinite
use
of
a
small
numberis
specially
common
where
two
consecutive
Units
are
given
as
alternatives,
e.g.
Is
IT,
'
two
or
three,'
'four
or
five.'
A
variety
of
this
idiom
is
the
use
of
two
consecutive
units
to
introduce
emphatically
the
higher
of
the
two;
e.g.
Pr
302'
-por
three
things
the
earth
doth
tremble,
and
for
four
which
it
cannot
bear';
then
four
things
are
enumerated.
In
addition
to
hundreds
and
thousands
and
ten
thousands,
the
most
common
number
used
in
this
approximate
way
is
'forty':
people
constantly
live
or
reign
for
'forty
years'
or
multiples
of
forty
years.
It
is
a
matter
of
opinion
how
far
the
numerous
'sevens,'
'tens,'
and
'twelves'
were
originally
intended
as
exact
numbers.
Probably,
however,
in
many
cases
what
were
originally
round
numbers
were
taken
afterwards
to
be
exact.
For
in-stance,
David's
reign
is
given
as
40
years,
2
S
5';
in
the
next
verse
this
period
is
explained
as
made
up
of
7i
years
at
Hebron
and
33
at
Jerusalem
—
an
explana-tion
which
implies
that,
apart
from
some
odd
months,
the
40
years
were
the
actual
length
of
the
reign.
There
are
some
indications,
too.
that
the
various
40's
and
80's
were
added
in
with
other
numbers
to
obtain
a
continuous
chronology.
Again,
in
Nu
3^>
the
census
gives
22,000
Levites,
which
one
would
naturally
under-stand
as
a
round
number;
but
in
vv."-6i
it
is
taken
as
an
exact
number,
inasmuch
as
it
is
ordained
that
because
the
22,273
firstborn
exceed
the
Levites
by
273,
re-demption-money
shall
be
paid
for
the
surplus.
In
view
of
the
references
to
captains
of
thousands,
hundreds,
fifties,
and
tens
'in
Dt
1'',
it
has
been
sug-gested
that
these
terms
are
sometimes
not
numerals,
but
names
corresponding
to
our
regiment,
company,
squad,
etc.,
and
denoting
bodies
of
men
whose
numbers
varied.
'Thousand'
especially
has
been
held
to
be
a
term
denoting
'tribe'
or
'clan'
(see
Jg
6",
1
S
10");
so
that
'a
thousand'
might
contain
comparatively
few
men.
This
view
has
been
applied
to
make
the
census
in
the
Bk.
of
Numbers
more
credible
by
reducing
the