˟

Dictionary of the Bible

711

 
Image of page 0732

PERSON OF CHRIST

PERSON OF CHRIST

but the ebb and flow of His inner, spiritual lite and the sinless development ol the early years. It is true that such a sinless development is incomprehensible to us. To ethical psychology it remains an undecipherable mystery. All we can say is that it is because no one ever so felt His utter dependence upon God, and hence knew how much in God He had to depend upon, that, from first to last, Jesus kept His holiness pure (cf . Du Bose, Gospel in the Gospels, ch. 13). When we think out the idea of sinless-ness, however, and consider how adult manhood rises with organic continuity out of childhood and infancy, we can hardly escape the inference that Jesus' stainless life had from the first a different personal content from ours. The theological expression for this would then be, that in His case Divinity was the basis and condition of perfect humanity.

7. Virgin-birth. ā€” In the Gospels of Matthew and Luke the Divine Sonship of Jesus is viewed as being mediated in part by the bestowal of the Spirit at His baptism, in part by the supernatural character of His conception. Weight may justly be laid on the fact that both Evangel-ists, divergent as their narratives of the conception are in certain points, agree in affirming the special action of the Holy Ghost. On the other hand, no refer-ence to the Virgin-birth is to be found elsewhere in the NT. It is not present in Gal # or Ro V; and few would say with Westcott that the fact of the miraculous conception, though not stated, is necessarily implied in Jn 1". This silence might, indeed, have led men to ask whether any statement on the subject ought in wisdom to form part of the Creed; and yet again, it would be a mistake to overstrain the argumentum e sUenlio. The very fact that the eternal Divinity of Christ could thus be held and interpreted without re-course to the idea of virgin-birth proves that that idea did not arise as a psychologically inevitable religious postulate, and may therefore claim to have genuine tradition behind it. The present writer can only say that to him supernatural conception appears a really befit-ting and credible preface to a life which was crowned by resurrection from the dead. That an abnormal fact in the sphere of nature should answer to the transcendent spiritual element in the Person of Christ is both a Scrip-tural and a profoundly philosophical thought. Never-theless, the Christian faith of many will always shrink from the assertion that virgin-birth is a sine qua non of real incarnation, or that, in any ultimate sense, it ex-plains the wonder and glory of Jesus' Person.

II. Primitive Apostolic Doctrine. ā€” As representing this stage of thought, we may take, with some caution, the discourses of St. Peter in Acts, checking our results later by comparison with his First Epistle.

1. St. Peter's discourses in Acts. ā€” The Christology of these discourses is, on the whole, extremely simple. It would have been strange, indeed, had the Apostolic mind come to understand the Person of Christ otherwise than gradually. The words 'Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs' (Ac 2Ā»), are the earliest Petrine description of Jesus, and the rudimentary nature of the suggested doctrine is characteristic. A parallel to this is the later verse, from the sermon in Cornelius' house: ' God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with power: who went about doing good, ... for God was with hira' (Id's). The gist of St. Peter's gospel is that this Jesus is the promised Messiah, attested as such by wonderful works, resurrection, and ascen-sion to glory (222-M- Ā»ā€¢ Ā»). Hence the name 'Jesus Christ' now appears; 'Christ,' when it occurs by itself, being an official, not yet a personal title. The ministry of Jesus as teacher is scarcely referred to, except in 10". But His death, as Divinely ordained and foreknown, and above all His deliverance from death, with the exaltation which followed, are the themes to which the speaker perpetually recurs.

A tendency has been shown, in view of the fact

that Jesus is thus described as 'anointed with the Holy Spirit,' as 'the holy one and the just' (3"), and as a great prophet (3^2), to infer that the primitive Church held a merely humanitarian view of His Person. We have already conceded, or rather asserted, that the doctrine is rudimentary. Specially deserving of note is the eschatological light in which the whole is viewed ā€” Jesus being represented as gone meanwhile into heaven, thds affording the Jews time for repentance, upon which will ensue His return to a restored creation (3iĀ»-Ā«'). All is as yet within the limits of nationalistic Messianism. Yet when we look more closely there are clear indications of another kind. Jesus has been exalted to the right hand of God, and made Lord of all things; He is the giver of the Holy Spirit (2^); He knows the hearts of all men (1^); He is the Judge of quick and dead (10*'). He is set forth quite definitely as the theme of the gospel and the object of faith, from whom repentance and forgiveness come. Prayer is freely offered to Him (IM 769). Again and again His name, i.e. He Himself as revealed and known, is proclaimed as the only medium of salvation (2'Ā» 3" 4Ā« 10"). Hence, while no attempt has yet been made to define His Person, the attitude of believers to Him is quite clearly one of faith and worship. We can scarcely overestimate the significance for Jews of this ascription of universal Lordship to One with whom they had eaten and drunk, and of whose death they had been witnesses.

2. The First Epistle of St. Peter. ā€” The interest of this Epistle lies rather in soteriology than in the doctrine of Christ's Person. The sufferings of the Cross are viewed as having been predestined by God and foretold by prophets, and, in connexion with the atonement accomplished thereby, the sinlessness of Jesus as sacrificial victim is insisted on (1 P 1"). One significant fact indicating the writer's favourite view of the Saviour's Person, is that, whereas the name 'Jesus' is nowhere used by itself, 'Christ' has become a proper name; and it is natural to interpret this change as 'due to the fact that the person of Jesus is contemplated by the Christian exclusively in His specific quality as Mediator of salva-tion' (Weiss). It is a disputed point whether 1" in which the Spirit of Christ is said to have been present in the prophets, and 1'" which represents Him as fore- known before tlie foundation of the world, do or do not imply His real pre-existence. The arguments on either side are given in the commentaries; the present writer can only say briefly that the language of 1" appears to him to be satisfied if we take it to mean that the Divine Spirit, now so entirely bound up with Christ that it can be called His Spirit, was previously active in the prophets ; while the words 'foreknown before the foundation of the world' no more necessarily involve the personal pre-existence of Christ than the words ' He chose us in him before the foundation of the world' (Eph 1<) demand a similar conclusion as to believers. Thus foreknown and predicted, then, Christ has been mani-fested at the end of the times for our sakes. In His incarnate Person 'flesh' and 'spirit' are to be distin-guished (31*); and a careful investigation proves that by 'spirit' is meant the Divine principle in a potency higher than that in which it dwells in man, and possessed, for that reason, of an inherent and indestructible energy of life. In Ac 2** the ground of Jesus' resurrection is determined by prophecy ; here the further step is taken of referring it to the power of life that was in Him through the unction of the Spirit which constituted Him Messiah. We need not pause at present on the enigma of the descent to Hades (S" i'; is it connected with Eph i" and 1 Ti 3iĀ«?), the clue to which has been lost; but at all events the writer means it as an illustration of the victorious and unparalleled powers of life that dwelt in Christ even prior to His resurrection, as well as of the wonderful redemptive efficacy of His death.

The Christology of 1 Peter is thus seen to be slightly more full and elaborate than that of the early chapters

705