year,
which
would
be
a
sabbatical
fallow,
the
year
of
jubilee,
and
the
following
year,
when
tillage
would
be
resumed.
Here
also
we
find
elaborate
directions
for
the
redemption
of
land
in
the
jubilee
year.
They
may
be
thus
summarized:
(1)
No
landed
property
may
be
sold,
but
only
the
usufruct
of
its
produce
up
to
the
next
jubilee,
and
the
price
must
be
calculated
by
the
distance
from
that
period.
(2)
A
kinsman
may
redeem
land
thus
mortgaged,
or
(the
meaning
may
possibly
be)
exercise
a
right
of
pre-emption
upon
it.
(3)
The
mort-
gager
may
redeem
at
the
selling
price,
less
the
yearly
proportion
for
the
time
elapsed
since
the
sale.
(4)
House
property
in
walled
towns
(not
in
villages)
may
be
sold
outright,
and
is
redeemable
only
during
one
year.
Such
property
was
presumably
regarded
as
human
and
arti-ficial,
whilst
all
land
was
essentially
the
property
of
Jehovah.
(5)
The
Levitical
possessions
were
redeemable
at
any
time,
and
did
not
come
under
the
jubilee
provisions.
(6)
Nothing
is
said
in
Lev.
as
to
the
remission
of
debts,
but
there
is
a
general
prohibition
of
usury.
(7)
In
Lv
27ie-a
a
field
devoted
to
Jehovah
must
be
valued
at
once
at
a
fixed
rate,
and
might
be
redeemed
at
this
price,
plus
a
fine
of
20
per
cent.,
up
to
the
year
of
jubilee.
If
not
redeemed
by
then
it
became
sacred
property:
no
redemption
of
it
was
thereafter
possible.
2.
Purposes
of
the
Sabbatical
rules.
—
The
purposes
underlying
the
ordinances
above
catalogued
may
be
classified
under
4
heads:
but
it
is
practically
Impossible
to
assign
any
certain
priority
of
time
to
any
one
of
the
classes,
(a)
The
periodical
fallow.
This
is
a
very
common
provision
in
agriculture,
and
the
seven
years'
period
is
still
observed
in
Syria.
Since
the
fallow
year
was
not
at
first
everywhere
simultaneous,
the
earlier
historical
books
are
silent
about
it
;
and
indeed
it
cannot
have
been
generally
observed.
For
the
70
years'
cap-tivity
and
desolation
of
the
land
was
regarded
as
makiHg
up
for
the
unobserved
Sabbaths
of
the
land
(2
Ch
362',
cf.
Lv
26»-
«).
The
reference
in
Neh
10"
may
be
to
the
periodical
fallow
or
to
the
remission
of
debts.
But
1
Mac
6*'-
53
shows
that
the
fallow
year
was
observed
later.
(6)
The
emandpaiion
of
slaves
(cf.
Jer
348-
■).
Such
a
provision
must
have
been
very
difiicult
to
enforce,
and
we
find
no
other
possible
reference
to
it.
(c)
The
remission
or
suspension
of
debts.
The
only
reference
is
the
dubious
one
in
Neh
10".
(d)
The
re-demption
of
real
property.
The
kind
of
tenure
here
implied
is
not
uncommonly
found
In
other
countries,
and
Jer
32'<'-.
Ru
4,
Ezk
7"
show
that
something
akin
to
it
did
exist
in
Palestine
(cf.
also
Ezk
46").
But
that
it
was
in
no
sense
universal
may
be
inferred
from
Isaiah's
and
Micah's
denunciations
of
land-grabbing;
on
the
other
hand,
1
K
21"-
'
furnishes
an
instance
of
the
in-alienability
of
land.
C!f.
Leviticus,
p.
543''.
In
general
we
have
no
sign
that
the
sabbatical
and
jubilee
provisions
were
ever
strictly
observed
in
Biblical
times.
Their
principles
of
rest
and
redemption,
though
never
practised
as
a
piece
of
social
politics,
were
preached
as
ideals,
and
may
have
had
some
effect
in
discouraging
slave-owning,
land-grabbing,
and
usury,
and
in
encourag-ing
a
more
merciful
view
of
the
relations
between
Jew
and
Jew.
Thus
Is
61'-'
is
steeped
in
the
jubilee
phrase-ology,
and
Christ
adopted
this
passage
to
explain
His
own
mission
(Lk
4'"*).
A.
W.
F.
Blunt.
SABBEUS
(1
Es
9'')
=
Shemaiab,
Ezr
10".
SABI
(1
Es
528)
=
Shobai,
Ezr
2«,
Neh
7«.
SABIAS
(1
Es
l»)
=
Hashabiah,
2
Ch
35>.
SABIE.
—
'The
children
of
Pochereth-hazzebaim,'
Ezr
2'',
Neh
7",
appear
as
'the
sons
of
Phacereth,
the
sons
of
Sable'
in
1
Es
S**.
SABTA,
SABTAH.
-In
the
genealogical
list
of
Gn
10'
a
son
of
Cush,
named
between
Havilah
and
other
Arabian
districts.
It
was
probably
a
region
on
or
near
the
east
coast
of
Arabia,
but
in
spite
of
several
conjectures
it
has
not
been
identified
with
any
historical
tribe
or
country.
The
relationship
with
Cush
is
to
be
accounted
for
on
the
ground
that
the
Cushites
were
held
to
have
extended
across
the
Red
Sea
from
Nubia
north-eastward
over
the
great
peninsula.
J.
F.
McCurdy.
SABTECA.
—
The
youngest
son
of
Cush
according
to
Gn
10'.
The
only
identification
at
all
plausible
has
been
made
with
Samydake
on
the
E.
side
of
the
Persian
Gulf.
But
this
is
improbable,
since
that
region
did
not
come
within
the
Cushite
domain,
as
judged
by
the
names
of
the
other
sons
of
Cush.
Possibly
Sabteca
is
a
mis-writing
for
Sabtah
(wh.
see).
J.
F.
McCuedy.
SACAB
.—1
.
The
father
of
Ahiam
(
1
Ch
1
1«
=
2
S
23»
Sharar).
2.
A
family
of
gatekeepers
(1
Ch
26<).
SACKBUT.—
See
Music,
etc.,
§
4
(c).
SACKCLOTH.—
The
sackcloth
of
OT
was
a
coarse
dark
cloth
made
on
the
loom
from
the
hair
of
goats
and
camels.
In
the
extant
literature
it
is
almost
always
associated
with
mourning
for
the
dead
(Gn
37**,
2
S
3''
and
oft.):
and
especially
with
the
public
expression
of
humiliation
and
penitence
in
view
of
some
national
misfortune,
present
or
impending
(1
K
21",
Neh
9',
Jon
3'
etc.).
For
other
tokens
of
grief
and
penitence,
associated
with
the
donning
of
sackcloth,
such
as
ashes
or
dust
on
the
head,
and
the
rending
of
garments
(this
being
a
later
substitute
for
their
entire
removal),
see
MouHNiNG
Customs.
In
such
cases
the
person
or
persons
concerned
are
generally
said
to
'
gird
'
themselves
with
sackcloth,
or
to
have
sackcloth
about
their
loins,
from
which
it
is
evident
that
the
sackcloth
was
worn
in
the
form
of
a
loincloth
or
waistcloth,
tied
in
the
ancient
manner
in
a
knot
in
front
(cf.
Is
20^
'loose
the
sackcloth,'
lit.
'
untie
the
knot
').
It
was
worn
by
women
as
well
as
by
men
(Is
32",
Jth
9').
The
putting
of
it
upon
cattle,
however,
as
mentioned
in
Jon
3*
and
Jth
4i",
and
even
upon
an
altar
(4"),
is,
from
the
nature
of
the
passages
cited,
rather
a
literary
than
a
historical
extravagance.
In
this
custom
most
modern
scholars
recognize
an
illustration
of
conservatism
in
religious
practice.
The
waistcloth
is
known
to
have
been
the
oldest
article
of
dress
among
the
Semites
(see
Dhess,
§
2),
and
as
such
it
appears
to
have
been
retained
in
mourning
customs
and
in
humiliation
before
God,
and
perhaps
in
the
exercise
of
the
cultus,
long
after
it
had
ceased
to
be
the
only
garment
of
the
people.
The
ihram
or
waistcloth
still
worn
by
the
Moslem
pilgrims
during
their
devotions
at
the
sacred
shrine
at
Mecca,
has
often
been
cited
as
a
modern
parallel.
A.
R.
S.
Kennedy.
SACRAMENTS.—
1.
The
term.—
Although
applied
by
common
consent
to
certain
institutions
of
the
NT,
the
word
'sacrament'
(Lat.
sacramentum)
is
not
a
Scrip-tural
one.
In
classical
Lat.
sacramentum
(fr.
sacrare,
'to
consecrate')
is
used
esp.
in
two
senses:
(a)
passively,
as
a
legal
term,
to
denote
a
sum
of
money
deposited
by
the
parties
to
a
suit,
which
was
forfeited
by
the
loser
and
appropriated
to
sacred
uses;
(6)
actively,
as
a
military
term,
to
denote
the
oath
taken
by
newly
enlisted
soldiers.
When
it
came
to
be
applied
to
Christian
uses,
the
word
retained
the
suggestions
of
both
of
those
earlier
employments.
A
sacrament
was
something
set
apart
for
sacred
purposes;
it
was
also,
in
certain
cases,
of
the
nature
of
a
vow
of
self-consecra-tion,
resembling
the
oath
of
the
Roman
soldier
(cf.
Tertullian:
'We
were
called
to
the
warfare
of
the
living
God
in
our
very
response
to
the
sacramental
words,'
ad
Mart.
ill.).
But
the
application
and
history
of
the
word
in
the
Christian
Church
were
determined
chiefly
by
the
fact
that
in
the
Old
Lat.
and
Vulg.
VSS
it
was
repeatedly
employed
imysterium,
however,
being
employed
more
frequently)
to
render
the
Gr.
mystirion,
'a
mystery.'
[Thus
Vulg.
tr.
St.
Paul's
'This
mystery
is
great'
(Eph
5^")
by
'Sacramentum
hoc
magnum
est
'
;
—
a
rendering
that
had
not
a
little
to
do
with
the
subsequent
erection
of
marriage
into
a
sacrament.]
This
identification
of
the
idea
of
a
sacrament
with
that