˟

Dictionary of the Bible

819

 
Image of page 0840

SACRIFICE AND OFFERING

the primitive idea of an offering as a meal for tlie deity (1 S 21<-», 1 K 7"). The mention in a later passage of 'the flagons thereof and the bowls thereof to pour out withal' (Ex 2529, gee, further, Shewbhead) shows that, as for an ordinary meal, the 'holy bread' was accom-panied by a provision of wine, in other words by a drink ofEering. This species of offering occurs as an independent offering only in Gn 35". The skins of wine mentioned in 1 S 1" 10' doubtless served in part for a drink or 'wine offering' (Hos 9*), in part, like the accompanying flour and loaves, for the sacriflcial meal. More explicit reference to the wine of the drink offering as an accompaniment of animal sacrifice is found in Dt 3238 (ct. the early reference, Jg 9'^, to wine 'which cheereth God'). For the ritual of the later drink ofEering, see § 11. It is significant of the predominant part played by the drink offering in early Babylonian ritual, that the word for libation (.nigu) has there become the usual term for sacrifice (.KAT' 595).

A brief reference must suffice for oil in early ritual (Gn 28'8, Jg 99, Mic 6'— for the later ritual, see § 11). A water offering appears only in the isolated cases 1 S 7«, 2 S 23", but emerges as an interesting survival in the rites of the Feast of Tabernacles (wh. see). Honey, although offered among the first-fruits (2 Ch 31'), was excluded, along with milk, from the altar (Lv 2"), on the ground that both were liable to fermentation (see also Leaven).

6. MaTEBIAI and KITUAIi OF SACRIFICE IN THIS

PERIOD. From the details just given it is evident that 'among the Hebrew offerings drawn from the vegetable kingdom, meal, wine, and oil take the chief place, and these were also the chief vegetable con-stituents of man's daily food' (,RS^ 219). The same remark holds good of the animal sacrifices, which were drawn chiefly from 'the herd,' i.e. neat cattle, and from the 'flock,' i.e. sheep and goats. Excluded from the altar, on the other hand, were not only all unclean animals, but also game and fish, which, not being reared by man, were probably regarded as God's special property, and therefore inadmissible as a present from man. This idea that only what was a man's ' very own ' constituted an appropriate sacrifice is reflected in David's words to Araunah, 2 S 24^ (offerings 'which cost me nothing' RV). Males of the various species, a heifer is mentioned in connexion with ordinary sacriflce only 1 S 162 (Gn 159, Dt 21=ff-, 1 S 6" do not belong to this category), and of these, yearlings, as in the later legis-lation, were doubtless the commonest victims, although we read of 'a bullock of three years old' (1 S 1^, see RVm; Jg 62* is corrupt, 'seven years old').

The question of human sacrifice cannot be passed over, even in this brief sketch of a vast subject. The recent excavations at Gezer and elsewhere (see High Place, § 3) have revealed the surprising extent to which this practice prevailed among the Canaanites (cf . 2 K 3^') , and well-attested instances are recorded even among the Hebrews (Jg 113o-io_ 1 K 16m RV, for which see HoDSB. § 3), apart altogether from the child sacrifices to Molech. Indeed, the familiar story of Abraham's frustrated sacrifice of Isaac is now regarded as a polemic against this inhuman custom, which certainly had no sanction in the religion of OT.

As regards the ritual of sacriflce in this period, we have little information, 1 S 2"-" being the only passage that touches definitely on this subject. This much is certain, that much greater latitude prevailed while the local sanctuaries existed than was afterwards the case; and also, that the priest played a much less conspicuous part in the rite than he does in the developed system of the Priests' Code. The chief function of the priest in the earliest times was to give 'direction' (tBr3,h) by means of the oracle, and to decide in matters pertaining to the sphere of 'clean and unclean.' The layman as father of the family or head of the clan, still more the anointed king offered his sacrifice without the

SACRIFICE AND OFFERING

intervention of the priest. The latter, however, as the custodian of the sanctuary, was entitled to his due (see 1 S I.e., Dt 183). At the more frequented sanctuaries Jerusalem, Bethel, Beersheba, etc. a more or less elaborate ritual was gradually evolved, for which the priest, as its depositary, became indispensable.

But even from the first the deity had to be approached with due precaution. The worshippers 'sanctified' themselves by ablutions (1 S 16'), and by washing (Ex 19'») or changing their garments (Gn 359); for only those who were ceremonially ' clean ' could approach the altar of J". The sacrificer then entered the high place and immolated the sacriflcial victim, originally, it would appear, upon the altar itself (Gn 22', 1 S 14'".), so that the blood ran over it; later, near to the altar, care being taken that the blood was caught and poured out at its base. The victim was next cut up and the fat of the viscera removed. In the case of an ordinary sacriflce (zeback), to judge from 1 S 2", the fiesh was boiled for the sacrificial meal, and not until the latter was ready was the fat, J"'s special portion, burned upon the altar. By this simultaneous consumption of the sacrifice the table-fellowship of J" and His guests was more strikingly realized, the latter "eating and drinking before the Lord,' as the 'sweet smoke' (qetSreih) ascended from the altar, an 'odour of soothing (EV 'sweet savour') unto the Lord.'

While the normal attitude of the worshippers on such occasions was one of rejoicings, as became those who, by thus renewing their covenant relation to J" in the way appointed, felt themselves secure of His favour and protection, a more serious note, implying a sense of alienation and the need of propitiation, is not infre-quently found even in pre-exilic sacriflce, as will appear in a later section 13).

6. The developed sacrificial system of the post-exilic period Its general features. In an earlier section it was shown how intimately connected with the everyday life of the family were the free, joyous sacrifices at the local sanctuaries. The abolition of the latter by Josiah, in accordance with the demands of Deuteronomy (for the justification of this measure, see High Place, § 6), marks an epoch in the history of OT sacrifice. Hitherto every slaughter of a domestic animal tor the entertainment of a guest, or to celebrate a family ' event,' was a form of sacriflce (for a remarkable list and description of such 'immolations' as practised by the Arabs of Moab at the present day, see Jaussen, Coidumes des Arabes au pays de Moab [1908], 337-363). Henceforward this was no longer so. 'The restriction of legitimate sacrifice to the one distant sanctuary at Jerusalem meant in practice the divorce from common life of the principal rite of religion. The Temple, from being only one, although certainly the most important, of the local sanctuaries of Judah, became the one national sanctuary; the cultus assumed an official character, while its dignity was enhanced by the presence of a numerous priesthood and a more elaborate ritual. Sacrifice, in short, lost its former spontaneity and became a statutory obligation. The Jewish nation had taken the first step towards becoming the Jewish Church.

A still more potent factor, making for change, soon appeared in the shape of the crushing calamity of the Exile. Then, at last, the words of the prophets came home to men's hearts and minds, and it was recognized that the nation had received the due reward of its deeds. A deepened sense of sin and a heightened conception of the Divine holiness were two of the most precious fruits of the discipline of the Exile. The confident assurance of J"'s protection and good-will, which marked the rela-tions of worshipper and worshipped in the days of Israel s prosperity, had passed away. In its place arose a conviction of the need of expiation and propitiation a conviction reflected in the whole sacriflcial system, as gradually systematized and elaborated, on the basis of the usage of the Temple, by successive generations

813