WAR
tiaUy
a
religious
duty,
begun
and
carried
through
under
the
highest
sanctions
of
religion.
Israel's
wars
of
old
were
'the
wars
of
J"'
(Nu
21"),
and
was
not
Jahweh
Tseba'Bth,
especially
'the
God
of
Israel's
battle-array'
(1
S
17").?
His
presence
with
the
host
was
secured
by
'the
ark
of
J"'
accompanying
the
army
in
the
field
(2
S
11",
cf.
1
S
4«).
As
an
indispensable
preliminary,
therefore,
of
every
campaign,
the
soldiers
'sanctified'
themselves
(Jos
3')
by
ablutions
and
other
observances
preparatory
to
offering
the
usual
sacrifices
(1
S
7»
13»).
The
men
thus
became
God's
'consecrated
ones'
(Is
13«
RV),
and
to
open
a
campaign
is
in
Heb.
phrase
'to
consecrate
war'
(Jl
39,
Jer
6*
etc.).
Is
21'
'anoint
the
shield'
(cf.
2
S
1")
is
commonly
taken
to
allude
to
a
practice
of
smearing
shields
with
oil,
that
hostile
weapons
might
more
readily
glance
off
(see,
for
another
explanation,
Marti
or
Duhm,
Jesaia,
ad
loc.).
To
ascertain
the
propitious
moment
for
the
start,
and
indeed
throughout
the
campaign,
it
was
usual
to
'en-quire
of
the
Lord'
by
means
of
the
sacred
lot
(Jg
1',
1
S
232
and
oft.),
and
in
an
age
of
more
advanced
religious
thought,
by
the
mouth
of
a
prophet
(1
K
22"f).
Still
later
a
campaign
was
opened
with
prayer
and
fasting
(1
Mac
3"B).
As
regards
the
conunissariat,
it
was
probably
usual,
as
in
Greece,
to
start
with
three
days'
provisions,
the
soldiers,
for
the
rest,
helping
themselves
from
friends
(cf.
however,
the
voluntary
gifts,
2
S
17"^)
and
foes.
The
arrangement
by
which
'ten
men
out
of
every
hundred
'
were
told
off
'
to
fetch
victual
for
the
people
'
(Jg
20'"),
is
first
met
with
in
a
late
document.
3.
As
the
army
advanced,
scouts
were
sent
out
to
ascertain
the
enemy's
position
and
strength
(Jg
1^
[AV
'spies,'
RV
'watchers'],
1
S
26«,
1
Mac
5»«).
Where
the
element
of
secrecy
enters,
we
may
call
them
spies
(so
Jos
2'
RV,
2
S
15»»,
1
Mac
12!»;
cf
.
Gideon's
exploit,
Jg
7"H).
Little
is
known
of
the
camps
of
the
Heb.
armies.
The
men
were
sheltered
in
tents
and
booths
(2
S
11";
this
reference,
however,
is
to
a
lengthy
siege).
The
general
commanding
probably
had
a
more
elaborate
'pavilion'
(1
K
20".
w
see
Tent).
The
obscure
term
rendered
by
RV
'place
of
the
wagons'
(1
S
17™
26'-is
derived
from
a
root
which
justifies
us
in
supposing
that
the
Hebrew
camps
were
round,
rather
than
square.
Of
the
20
Assyrian
camps
represented
on
the
bronze
plates
of
the
gates
of
Balawat,
4
are
circular,
14
almost
square,
and
2
have
their
long
sides
straight
and
their
short
sides
curved
outwards.
Two
gates
are
repre-sented
at
opposite
ends,
between
which
a
broad
road
divides
the
camp
into
two
almost
equal
parts
(Biller-beck
u.
Delitzsch,
Die
PalasttoreSalmanassars,
II.
[1908],
104).
The
Hebrews
divided
the
night
into
three
watches
(Jg
7",
1
S
11").
4.
The
tactics
of
the
Hebrew
generals
were
as
simple
as
their
strategy.
Usually
the
'
battle
was
set
in
array
'
by
the
opposing
forces
being
drawn
up
in
line
facing
each
other.
At
a
given
signal,
each
side
raised
its
battle-cry
(Jg
7^',
Am
1",
Jer
4")
as
it
rushed
to
the
fray;
for
the
wild
slogan
of
former
days,
the
Ironsides
of
the
Jewish
Cromwell,
Judas
the
Maccabee,
substituted
prayer
(1
Mac
5=^)
and
the
singing
of
Psalms
(2
Macl2").
It
was
a
common
practice
for
a
general
to
divide
his
forces
into
three
divisions
(Jg
7'»,
1
S
11",
2
S
18^,
1
Mac
535).
A
favourite
piece
of
tactics
was
to
pretend
flight,
and
by
leaving
a
body
of
men
in
ambush,
to
fall
upon
the
unwary
pursuers
in
front
and
rear
(Jos
8",
Jg
20'=).
As
examples
of
more
elaborate
tactics
may
be
cited
Joab's
handling
of
his
troops
before
Rabbath-ammon
(2
S
10'-"),
and
Benhadad's
massing
of
his
chariots
at
the
battle
of
Ramoth-gilead
(1
K
22");
the
campaigns
of
Judas
Maccabseus
would
repay
a
special
study
from
this
point
of
view.
The
recall
was
sounded
on
the
war-horn
(2
S
2^'
18"
2022).
5.
The
tender
mercies
of
the
victors
in
those
days
were
cruel,
although
the
treatment
which
the
Hebrews
WATER
meted
out
to
their
enemies
was,
with
few
exceptions
(e.g.
2
K
15"),
not
to
be
compared
to
what
Benzinger
only
too
aptly
describes
as
'the
Assyrian
devilries.'
It
is
one
of
the
greatest
blots
on
our
RV
that
2
S
12"
should
still
read
as
it
does,
instead
of
as
in
the
margin
(see
Cent.
Bible,
in
loc).
The
Hebrew
wars,
as
has
been
said,
were
the
wars
of
J",
and
to
J"
of
right
be-longed
the
population
of
a
conquered
city
(see
Ban).
Even
the
humane
Deuteronomic
Code
spares
only
the
women
and
children
(Dt
20"'-).
The
captives
were
mostly
sold
as
slaves.
A
heavy
war
indemnity
or
a
yearly
tribute
was
imposed
on
the
conquered
people
(2
K
3').
The
booty
fell
to
the
victorious
soldiery,
the
leaders
receiving
a
special
share
(Jg
8^-,
1
S
30»«).
The
men
'that
tarried
by
the
stuff'
—
in
other
words,
who
were
left
behind
as
a
camp-guard
—
shared
equally
with
their
comrades
'
who
went
down
to
the
battle
'(IS
30^'-,
a
law
first
introduced
by
David,
but
afterwards
charac-teristically
assigned
to
Moses,
Nu
Sl^').
The
returning
warriors
were
welcomed
home
by
the
women
with
dance
and
song
(Ex
15™"-,
Jg
U«,
1
S
18«
etc.).
The
piety
of
the
Maccabffian
age
found
a
more
fitting
expression
in
a
service
of
thanksgiving
(1
Mac
*").
See
also
Army,
AEMorni
Abms,
Fohtification
and
SrEOE-CHAFT.
A.
R.
S.
Kennedy.
WARS
OP
THE
LORD,
BOOK
OF
THE.—
A
work
quoted
in
Nu
21"'-
to
settle
a
point
with
regard
to
the
boundary
of
Moab
and
Ammon.
The
quotations
in
vv.i'-
18.
B'-M
are
probably
from
the
same
original.
This
is
the
only
mention
of
the
book
in
the
OT.
It
is
not
likely
that
the
work
is
identical
with
the
Book
of
Jashar.
It
probably
consisted
of
a
collection
of
songs
celebrating
the
victories
of
Israel
over
their
neighbours.
The
song
in
Ex
15'-"
describing
the
Lord
as
'a
man
of
war'
has
been
thought
to
be
derived
from
it.
The
date
of
the
work
is
unknown.
As
it
deals
with
the
heroic
age,
it
likely
originated
in
the
period
immediately
following,
and
it
has
been
dated
in
the
reign
of
Omri
(Stade),
and
by
others
as
early
as
the
time
of
David
or
Solomon.
If
Nu
212'-s»
refer
to
the
wars
of
Omri,
we
must
regard
the
work
as
a
product
of
the
N.
kingdom.
W.
F.
Boyd.
WASHPOT.—
Only
Ps
60»
=
108»,
as
a
figure
of
con-tempt.
The
'pot'
(sir)
was
also
used
for
boiling
(see
House,
9).
WATCH.—
See
Time.
WATCHMAN.—
See
City.
WATCH
TOWER.—
See
Vine.
WATER.
—
The
scarcity
of
water
in
the
East
lends
it
a
special
value.
Its
presence
in
some
form
is
essential
to
life.
The
f
ruitf
ulness
of
the
land
depends
on
the
quantity
available
for
watering.
The
Jordan,
with
its
great
springs,
is
too
low
for
the
irrigation
of
anything
but
the
valley.
There
are
many
fountains
in
Palestine,
but
most
fail
in
summer.
The
average
annual
rainfall
approaches
30
inches.
But
this
is
confined
to
the
months
from
April
till
October;
and
the
water
would
rush
down
the
slopes
to
the
sea,
were
it
not
caught
and
stored
for
future
use.
The
limestone
formation,
with
its
many
caves,
made
easy
the
construction
of
cisterns
and
reservoirs
to
collect
the
rain
water:
thence
supplies
were
drawn
as
required
during
the
dry
months.
Wherever
water
is
found,
there
is
greenery
and
beauty
all
through
the
year.
In
the
Maritime
Plain
plentiful
supplies
of
water
are
found
on
digging
(Gn
26'™).
To
fill
up
the
wells
would
make
the
district
uninhabitable.
Invading
armies
were
at
times
reduced
to
sore
straits
by
the
stopping
of
wells
(2
K
3"-
^),
or
diversion
and
concealment
of
the
stream
from
a
fountain
(2
Ch
32").
The
earliest
use
of
water
was
doubtless
to
allay
the
thirst
of
man
and
beast.
Refusal
of
drink
to
a
thirsty
man
would
be
universally
condemned
(Gn
24'"-,
Jn
4').