WORLD
deeper
emphasis.
'The
cares
of
the
world
choke
the
word'
(Mt
13'^,
Mk
4"):
the
'sons
of
this
world'
are
contrasted
with
the
'sons
of
light'
(Lk
168;
of.
Ro
122,
Eph
22
'according
to
the
transient
fashion
[oeon]
of
this
material
world
Ikostnos]').
This
world
is
evil(Gal
1'),
its
wisdom
is
naught
(1
Co
l^"
2'
3"),
Its
rulers
crucified
the
Lord
of
glory
(1
Co
28);
finally,
it
is
the
'god
of
this
world'
that
has
blinded
the
minds
of
the
unbelieving
(2
Co
i').
This
ethical
use
of
(con='world'
is
not
found
in
the
Johannine
writings.
(2)
But
the
most
frequent
term
for
'
world
'
is
kosmos,
which
is
sometimes
extended
in
meaning
to
the
material
universe,
as
in
the
phrases
'
from
the
beginning
(
'founda-tion,'
'creation')
of
the
world'
(e.g.
Mt
242'
258<,
He
4',
Eo
V;
for
the
implied
thought
of
Divine
creation
cf.
Ac
14"
172*).
More
commonly,
however,
the
word
is
used
of
the
earth,
and
especially
the
earth
as
the
abode
of
man.
To
'gain
the
whole
world'
is
to
become
possessed
of
all
possible
material
wealth
and
earthly
power
(Mt
162»,
Mk
8^,
Lk
928).
Because
'sin
entered
into
the
world'
(Ro
5'2),
it
is
become
the
scene
of
the
Incarnation
and
the
object
of
Redemption
(2
Co
5",
1
Ti
118,
He
108,
Jn
l^-
>»•
2s
318.
w
I2i'),
the
scene
also,
alien
but
inevitable,
of
the
Christian
disciple's
life
and
discipline,
mission
and
victory
(Mt
5"
13*8
26",
Jn
17'8,
Ro
18,
1
Co
322
49
SI"
781,
2
Co
1>2,
Ph
2i8,
Col
18,
1
P
S',
Rev
11'8).
From
this
virtual
identifica-tion
of
the
'world'
with
mankind,
and
mankind
as
separated
from
and
hostile
to
God,
there
comes
the
ethical
signification
of
the
word
specially
developed
in
the
writings
of
St.
Paul
and
St.
John.
(a)
The
Epp.
of
St.
Paul.
To
the
Galatians
St.
Paul
describes
the
pre-Christian
life
as
slavery
to
'
the
rudi-ments
of
the
world'
(48,
cf.
v.');
through
Christ
the
world
is
crucified
to
him
and
he
to
the
world
(6").
Both
thoughts
recur
in
Colossians
(28-
20).
In
writing
to
the
Corinthians
he
condemns
the
wisdom,
the
passing
fashion,
the
care,
the
sorrow
of
the
world
(1
Co
128-
21
319
7S1.
S3.
S4_
2
Co
7'»;
cf.
aWn
above),
and
declares
the
Divine
choice
to
rest
upon
all
that
the
world
least
esteems
(1
Co
12'-
28,
cf.
Ja
2*).
This
perception
of
the
true
worth
of
things
is
granted
to
those
who
'
received
not
the
spirit
of
the
world,
but
the
spirit
which
is
of
God
'
(1
Co
2'2);
hence
'the
saints
shall
judge
the
world'
(1
Co
62,
cf.
1182).
In
the
argument
of
Romans
the
thought
of
the
Divine
judgment
of
the
'world'
has
incidental
place,
but
in
the
climax
St.
Paul
conceives
of
the
'fair
of
Israel
as
leading
to
'the
riches
of
the
world,'
and
of
the
'
casting
away
'
of
them
as
the
'
recon-ciling
of
the
world'
(II12.
is;
cf.
v.82
and
512-21).
What.
St.
Paul
condemns,
then,
is
hardly
the
world
as
essentially
evil,
but
the
world-spirit
which
leads
to
evil
by
its
neglect
of
the
unseen
and
eternal,
and
by
its
blindness
to
the
true
scale
of
values
revealed
in
the
gospel
of
Christ
crucified.
(6)
The
Gospel
and
First
Ep.
of
St.
John.
In
these
two
writings
occur
more
than
half
the
NT
instances
of
the
word
we
are
considering.
That
is,
the
term
kosmos
is
characteristic
of
St.
John,
and,
setting
aside
his
frequent
use
of
it
in
the
non-ethical
sense,
especially
as
the
sphere
of
the
incarnation
and
saving
work
of
Christ,
we
find
an
ethical
conception
of
the
'world'
deeper
in
its
shadows
than
that
of
St.
Paul.
It
is
true
that
Jesus
is
the
Light
of
the
world
(Jn
1'
3"
812
98
12«),
its
Life-giver
(688-
6i),
its
Saviour
(3"
4«
12");
yet
'the
world
knew
him
not
'
(1'8),
and
the
Fourth
Gospel
sets
out
its
story
of
His
persistent
rejection
by
the
world,
in
language
which
at
times
seems
to
pass
beyond
a
mere
record
of
contemporary
unbelief,
and
almost
to
assert
an
essential
dualism
of
good
and
evil
(7'
828
939
1231
141'-
30
iqu.
20).
Here
the
'
world
'
is
not
simply
the
worldly
spirit,
but
the
great
mass
of
mankind
in
deadly
hostility
to
Christ
and
His
teaching.
In
contrast
stand
His
disciples,
his
own
which
were
in
the
world'
(13i),
chosen
out
of
the
world
(1518,
cf.
178),
but
not
of
it,
and
therefore
hated
as
He
was
hated
(IS"-
"
17"-
'8).
For
them
He
intercedes
as
WRITING
He
does
not
for
the
world
(17').
In
the
1st
Ep.
of
St.
John
the
same
sharp
contrasts
meet
us.
The
world
lies
within
the
scope
of
God's
redemptive
purpose
in
Jesus
Christ
(22
4»),
yet
it
stands
opposed
to
His
followers
as
a
thing
wholly
evil,
with
which
they
may
hold
no
traffic
(216-17^
cf.
Ja
4'),
knowing
them
not
and
hating
them
(31-
18).
It
is
conceived
as
under
the
sway
of
a
power
essentially
hostile
to
God,—
the
antichrist
(2i8-
22
48;
cf.
'the
prince
of
this
world'
Jn
12"
148"
leu)
—
and
is
therefore
not
to
be
entreated
and
persuaded,
but
fought
and
overcome
by
the
'
greater
one
'
who
is
in
the
disciple
of
Christ
(4'i
S'-
').
Faith
'
overcometh
the
world,'
but
St.
John
reserves
tor
his
closing
words
his
darkest
ex-pression
of
a
persistent
dualism
of
good
and
evil,
light
and
darkness:
'
We
know
that
we
are
of
God,
and
the
whole
world
lieth
in
the
evil
one'
(5").
The
idiomatic
uses
of
the
term
'world'
in
Jn
7*
12i»,
1
Jn
31'
are
sufficiently
obvious.
For
the
difficult
expres-sion
'the
world
of
iniquity'
applied
to
the
tongue
(Ja
38),
see
the
Commentaries.
S.
W.
Green.
'WORM.
—
1.
sas.
Is
51*
(cf.
Arab.
sUs,
a
moth
or
a
worm),
the
larva
of
a
clothes-moth.
See
Moth.
2.
rimmah
(Ex
162*,
Job
25«,
Is
14").
3.
tsia'
,
tSWah,
or
tSla'ath
(Ex
162",
job
25»,
Is
14"
662«,
Jon
4'
etc.).
Both
2
and
3
are
used
to
describe
the
same
kind
of
worms
(cf.
Ex
le'"-
2*),
and
most
references
are
to
maggots
and
other
insect
larvae
which
breed
on
putrid
organic
matter.
These
are
very
common
in
Palestine,
occurring
even
on
neglected
sores
and,
of
course,
on
dead
bodies
(Job
192«
2128
242").
Jonah's
worm
(JSU'ah)
was
probably
some
larva
which
attacks
the
roots,
or
perhaps
a
centipede.
The
'worms'
of
Dt
28"'
were
probably
caterpillars.
4.
rSgaft
(Hos
512
AVm).
In
Pr
12*
where
the
same
word
is
also
tr.
'rottenness,'
It
is
rendered
in
LXX
skSlex,
'
wood-worm,'
which
seems
appropriate
to
the
context.
6.
ztchaWOrets,
'worms
of
the
earth'
(Mic
7"),
may
possibly
refer
to
true
earth-worms
(which
are
comparatively
rare
in
Palestine),
but
more
probably
to
serpents.
See
Serpent
(10).
6.
skmx,
Mk
9«
etc.
The
expression
'
eaten
of
worms,'
used
(Ac
1228)
in
describing
the
death
of
Herod
Agrippai.,
would
seem
to
refer
to
a
death
accompanied
by
violent
abdominal
pains,
such
symptoms
being
commonly
ascribed
in
the
Holy
Land
to-day
to
abdominal
worms
(Lumbricoides)
—
a
belief
often
revived
by
the
evacuation
of
such
worms
near
the
time
of
death
(cf.
p.
600«).
E.
W.
G.
Mastehman.
WORMWOOD
(la'anah,
Dt
29",
Pr
5»,
Jer
918
23i8.
La
318-
1',
Am
5'
6"
[in
the
last
AV
tr.
'hemlock']:
Gr.
apsinthos,
Rev
8").
—
la'anah
was
some
bitter
sub-stance
usually
associated
with
gall
(wh.
see);
it
is
used
metaphorically
for
calamity
and
sorrow.
Tradition
favours
some
species
of
Artemisia
(wormwood),
of
which
several
kinds
are
found
in
Palestine.
E.
W.
G.
Masterman.
WORSHIP.—
SeeADORATiON,
Praise,
Prayer,
Preach-ing,
Synagogue,
Temple.
In
Lk
14i"
AV
'worship'
means
reverence
(RV
'glory')
from
man
to
man.
WOT.—
See
Wit.
WOULD.—
See
Will.
WRATH.—
See
Anger,
p.
34».
WRESTLING.—
See
Games,
p.
282'>.
WRITING.—
1.
Pre-historic-
The
origin
of
writing
is
not
recorded
In
Genesis,
where
we
should
expect
to
find
some
account
of
it,
but
this
omission
may
be
In-tentional.
Since
God
Is
represented
as
writing
on
two
Tables
of
stone
(Ex
3218'-),
it
might
seem
improper
that
He
should
employ
a
human
invention,
while,
on
the
other
hand,
there
may
have
been
no
tradition
that
the
art
was
first
used
on
that
occasion;
the
inference
is
therefore
left
to
be
drawn
by
the
reader.
Perhaps
we
may
infer
from
the
phrase
in
Is
81
that
there
was
a
style
known
as
'
Divine
writing,'
being
the
character
used
in
these
Tables.
The
Tables
themselves
scarcely
figure
in
the