APOCALYPTIC
LITERATURE
two
centuries
before
Christ.
It
was
probably
written
In
Hebrew
or
Aramaic,
and
then
translated
into
Greek,
and
from
that
into
Ethiopic
and
Latin.
As
it
now
exists,
the
collection
is
a
survival
of
a
wide-spread
Enoch
Uterature,
and
its
constituent
sections
have
been
to
a
considerable
extent
edited
by
both
Jews
and
Christians.
Critics,
while
varying
as
to
details,
are
fairly
well
agreed
as
to
the
main
component
sources,
each
probably
representing
a
different
author
or
school.
(i.)
The
original
ground-work
of
the
present
book
is
to
be
found
in
chs.
1-36
and
72-104,
in
the
midst
of
which
are,
however,
numerous
interpolations
(see
iv.
below).
These
chapters
were
probably
written
befores.c.
100.
Chs.
1-36
deal
chiefly
with
the
portrayal
of
the
punishment
to
be
awarded
the
enemies
of
the
Jews
and
sinners
generally
on
the
Day
of
Judgment.
The
esohatology
of
these
chapters
is
somewhat
sensuous
as
regards
both
the
resurrection
and
rewards
and
punishments.
In
them
we
have
probably
the
oldest
piece
of
Jewish
literature
touching
the
general
resur-rection
of
Israel
and
representing
Gehenna
as
a
place
of
final
punishment
(see
Gehenna).
The
dream
visions
(chs.
83-90)
were
probably
written
in
the
time
of
Judas
Maccabaeus
or
John
Hyrcanus.
By
the
use
of
symbolic
animals
—
sheep,
rams,
wild
beasts
—
Hebrew
history
is
traced
to
the
days
of
the
Hasmonsean
revolt.
The
years
of
misery
are
represented
by
a
flock
under
seventy
shepherds,
who,
in
the
new
age
about
to
dawn,
are
to
be
east
with
the
evil
men
and
angels
into
an
abyss
of
fire.
The
Messiah
is
then
to
appear,
although
his
function
is
not
definitely
described.
In
en.
91
the
future
is
somewhat
more
trauscendentally
described.
In
the
later
chapters
of
this
oldest
section
the
new
escha-tology
is
more
apparent.
In
them
are
to
be
found
repre-sentations
of
the
sleep
of
the
righteous,
the
resurrection
of
the
spirit
of
the
Messiah,
though
human,
as
God's
Son
(1052),
the
Day
of
Judgment,
and
the
punishment
of
the
wicked
in
hell.
(ii.)
Whether
ornotthesecondgroupof
chapters
(37-71),
or
the
Similitudes,
is
post-
or
pre-Christian
has
been
thoroughly
discussed.
The
general
consensus
of
recent
critics,
however,
is
that
the
Similitudes
were
probably
written
somewhere
between
B.C.
94
and
64:
at
all
events,
before
the
time
of
Herod.
The
most
remarkable
characteristic
of
these
Similitudes
is
the
use
of
the
term
'Son
of
Man'
for
the
Messiah.
But
it
is
not
possible
to
see
in
the
use
of
this
term
any
reference
to
the
historical
Jesus.
More
likely
it
marks
a
stage
in
the
development
of
the
term
from
the
general
symbolic
usage
of
Dn
V^
to
the
strictly
Messianic
content
of
the
NT.
In
the
Similitudes
we
find
described
the
judgment
of
all
men,
both
alive
and
dead,
as
well
as
of
angels.
Yet
the
future
is
still
to
some
extent
sensuous,
although
transcendental
influences
are
very
evident
in
the
section.
The
Messiah
pre-exists
and
is
more
than
a
man.
The
share
which
he
has
m
the
reorganization
of
the
world
is
more
prominent
than
in
the
older
sections.
(iii.)
Interspersed
throughout
the
book
are
sections
which
Charles
calls
the
book
of
celestial
physics.'
These
sections
are
one
of
the
curiosities
of
scientific
literature,
and
may
be
taken
as
a
fair
representative
of
the
astronomical
and
meteorological
beliefs
of
the
Palestinian
Jews
about
the
time
of
Christ.
(iv.)
Interpolations
from
the
so-called
Book
of
Noah,
which
are
very
largely
the
work
of
the
last
part
of
the
pre-Christian
era,
although
it
is
not
possible
to
state
accurately
the
date
of
their
composition.
The
importance
of
Enoch
is
great
for
the
understand-ing
of
the
eschatology
of
the
NT
and
the
methods
of
apocalyptic.
(6)
The
(Slavonic)
Secrets
of
Enoch
probably
had
a
pre-Christian
original,
and
further,
presupposes
the
existence
of
the
Ethiopic
Enoch.
It
could
not,
there-fore,
have
been
written
much
prior
to
the
time
of
Herod,
and,
as
the
Temple
is
still
standing,
must
have
been
written
before
a.d.
70.
The
author
(or
authors)
was
probably
a
Hellenistic
Jew
living
in
the
first
half
of
the
1st
cent.
A.D.
The
book
is
particularly
interesting
in
that
in
it
is
to
be
found
the
first
reference
to
the
millennium
(xxxii.
2-xxxiii.
2),
which
is
derived
from
a
combination
of
the
seven
creative
days
and
Ps
90'.
At
the
close
of
the
six
thousand
years,
the
new
day,
or
Sabbath
of
the
thousand
years,
was
to
begin.
The
Secrets
of
Enoch
is
a
highly
developed
picture
of
the
coming
age
and
of
the
structure
of
the
heaven,
which,
it
holds,
is
seven-fold.
Here,
too,
are
the
Judgment,
though
of
APOCALYPTIC
LITERATURE
individuals
rather
than
of
nations,
the
two
seons,
the
complete
renovation
or
destruction
of
the
earth.
There
is
no
mention
of
a
resurrection,
and
the
righteous
are
upon
death
to
go
immediately
to
Paradise.
2.
The
Book
of
Jubilees
is
a
Haggadist
commentary
on
Genesis,
and
was
probably
written
in
the
Maccabsean
period,
although
its
date
is
exceedingly
uncertain,
and
may
possibly
be
placed
in
the
latter
half
of
the
last
cent.
B.C.
In
this
writing
angelology
and
demonology
are
well
developed.
While
there
is
no
mention
of
the
Messiah,
the
members
of
the
Messianic
age
are
to
live
a
thousand
years,
and
are
to
be
free
from
the
influence
or
control
of
Satan.
The
book
contains
no
doctrine
of
the
res-urrection;
but
spirits
are
immortal.
While
there
is
punishment
of
the
wicked,
and
particularly
of
evil
spirits
and
the
enemies
of
Israel,
the
Judgment
is
not
thoroughly
correlated
with
a
general
eschatological
scheme.
The
chief
object
of
the
book
is
to
incite
the
Jews
to
a
greater
devotion
to
the
Law,
and
the
book
is
legalistic
—
rather
than
idealistic.
The
'new
age'
was
to
be
inaugurated
by
wide-spread
study
of
the
Law,
to
which
the
Jews
would
be
forced
by
terrible
suffering.
Certain
passages
would
seem
to
imply
a
resurrection
of
the
dead
and
a
renewing
of
all
creation
along
with
the
endless
punishment
of
the
wicked.
3.
The
Psalms
o£
Solomon
—
a
group
of
noble
songs,
written
by
a
Pharisee
(or
Pharisees)
probably
between
B.C.
70
and
40,
the
dates
being
fixed
by
reference
to
the
Roman
conquest
of
Jerusalem
and
the
death
of
Pompey
(Ps-Sol
ii.
30,
31).
The
collection
is
primarily
a
justification
of
the
downfall
of
the
Maccabiean
house
because
of
its
sins.
Its
author
(or
authors)
was
opposed
to
monarchy
as
such,
and
looked
forward
to
the
time
when
the
Messiah
would
really
be
king
of
Judaea.
The
picture
of
this
king
as
set
forth
in
Psalms
xvii-xviii
is
one
of
the
noblest
in
Jewish
literature.
He
is
to
be
neither
sufferer
nor
teacher,
pre-existent
nor
miracu-lously
born.
He
is
not
to
be
a
priest,
or
warrior.
He
is
to
be
sinless,
strong
through
the
Holy
Spirit,
gaining
his
wisdom
from
God,
conquering
the
entire
heathen
world
without
war,
'by
the
word
of
his
mouth,'
and
to
establish
the
capital
of
the
world
at
Jerusalem.
AU
the
members
of
the
new
kingdom,
which,
like
the
Messiah,
is
miraculous,
are
to
be
'sons
of
God.'
These
two
Psalms
are
not
of
a
kin
with
the
ordinary
apocalyptic
literature
like
the
Enoch
literature,
and
probably
represent
a
tendency
more
religious
than
apocalyptic.
At
the
same
time,
the
influence
of
the
apocalyptic
is
not
wanting
in
them.
4.
The
Assumption
of
Moses
was
probably
written
in
the
opening
years
of
the
1st
cent,
a.d.,
and
narrates
in
terms
of
prophecy
the
history
of
the
world
from
the
time
of
Moses
until
the
time
of
its
composition,
ending
in
an
eschatological
picture
of
the
future.
As
it
now
stands,
the
writing
is
hardly
more
than
a
fragment
of
a
much
larger
work,
and
exists
only
in
an
old
Latin
translation.
The
most
striking
characteristic
is
the
importance
given
to
Satan
as
the
opponent
of
God,
as
well
as
the
rather
elaborate
portrayal
of
the
end
of
the
age
it
narrates.
The
Judgment
is
to
be
extended
to
the
Gentiles,
but
no
Messiah
is
mentioned,
the
Messianic
kingdom
rather
than
He
being
central.
Further,
the
writer,
evidently
in
fear
of
revolutionary
tendencies
among
his
people,
says
distinctly
that
God
alone-is
to
be
judge
of
the
Gentiles.
5.
The
Testaments
of
the
Twelve
Patriarchs
is
a
com-posite
work
purporting
to
preserve
the
last
words
of
the
twelve
sons
of
Jacob.
It
was
probably
written
during
the
first
two
centuries
of
the
Christian
era,
although
some
of
its
material
may
be
earlier.
As
it
now
stands,
it
is
full
of
Christian
interpolations,
and
it
has
little
apocalyptic
material,
being
rather
of
the
nature
of
homilies
illustrated
with
much
legendary
matter,
including
eschatological
pictures
and
references
to
demons
and
their
king
Beliar.
The
new
age
is
not