BLASPHEMY
and
ct.
Wycllf's
tr.
of
Job
2'
'He
smot
lob
with
the
werste
stinkende
bleyne
fro
the
sole
ot
the
fot
unto
the
nol.'
The
word
is
still
retained
in
the
compound
chilblain.
BLASPHEMY.—
The
modern
use
ot
this
word
is
more
restricted
in
its
range
than
that
of
either
the
OT
or
the
NT.
1.
In
the
former
it
is
narrower
in
its
scope
than
in
the
latter,
being
almost
universally
confined
tolanguage
or
deeds
(1
Mac
2«)
derogating
from
the
honour
of
God
and
His
claims
to
the
over-lordship
of
men
(Lv
24"'-'5,
cf.
1
K
21i»-
'3,
2
K
196
etc.).
The
contemptuous
scorning
of
sacred
places
was
regarded
as
blasphemy
(see
1
Mac
2'
7^8,
cf.
Ac
e'^),
as
was
also
the
light
and
irresponsible
utterance
of
the
sacred
Name
(Is
62',
Ezk
362°,
Dt
5"),
the
degradation
of
Jehovah-worship
by
conformity
to
pagan
rites
(Ezk
20^'),
and
the
con-tinued
wilful
transgression
of
Divine
commands
and
despising
ot
'the
word
of
the
Lord'
(Nu
15'°').
The
incident
of
the
man
gathering
sticks
on
the
Sabbath
seems
to
be
a
concrete
example
of
blasphemy
(Nu
IS''').
2.
Wlien
we
come
to
the
NT,
the
word
is
found
more
frequently,
and
is
employed
in
a
manner
more
nearly
allied
to
the
usage
of
classical
writings.
The
EV
has
accordingly
tr.
it
often
as
'railing'
or
slanderous
talk
generally
(Mt
16'9=Mk
722,
Eph
48>,
Col
3',
1
Ti
6\
Jude'),
looked
at,
however,
on
its
ethical
and
religious
side.
The
cognate
verb,
too,
is
treated
in
the
same
way
(Mk
152'
=
Mt
27=°,
Lk
22ii5
238°,
Ro
3S
14i°,
1
Co
4"
103°,
Tit
32,
1
P
4i-
",
2
P
22-
>»•
12,
jude
»■
'«),
as
is
also
the
derived
adjective
(2
Ti
32,
2
P
2").
One
of
the
most
frequent
of
the
charges
brought
by
the
Jews
against
Jesus
was
that
of
blasphemy,
and
when
we
inquire
into
the
meaning
of
the
accusation,
we
find
that
it
was
the
application
to
Himself
of
Divine
attributes
and
prerogatives
(Mk
2'
=
Mt
9',
Mk
14*'
=
Mt
26«,
Jn
10«-
»).
On
the
other
hand,
the
NT
writers
regarded
the
unreasoning
attitude
of
the
Jews
to
the
claims
and
teaching
of
Jesus
as
blasphemous
(Mk
15M
=
Mt
273°,
Lk
22°5
23«,
Ac
13«
18°).
It
is
interesting
also
to
notice
that
this
is
the
word
put
by
the
author
of
the
Acts
into
the
mouth
ot
the
town-clerk
of
Ephesus
when
he
was
appeasing
the
riotous
mob
who
were
persuaded
that
St.
Paul
and
his
companions
had
insulted
the
local
deity
(Ac
19'').
3.
The
legal
punishment
for
blasphemy
was
death
(Lv
24'°),
and
so
the
Jews
claimed
the
life
of
Jesus,
as
the
just
and
lawful
outcome
of
His
words
and
teaching
(Jn
19',
cf.
1033
858f).
The
proto-martyr
Stephen
lost
his
life,
too,
on
a
charge
of
blasphemy
(Ac
6"
7°3),
when
Us
enemies,
in
a
violent
and
sudden
fit
of
rage,
forgot
the
limitation
Imposed
on
them
as
vassals
of
the
Roman
Empire
(cf.
Jn
IS'i;
see
Westcott,
Gospel
of
St.
John,
Additional
Note
in
loc).
On
the
'
blasphemy
against
the
Holy
Ghost,'
see
art.
Sin,
hi.
1.
J.
E.
Willis.
BLASTING.—
See
Mildew.
BLASTtJS.—
A
chamberlain
of
Agrippa
i.,
through
whose
intervention
the
people
of
Tyre
and
Sidon
secured
a
hearing
at
Caesarea
(Ac
12™).
BLEMISH.—
See
MEDiaNB.
BLESSEDNESS.
—
The
substantive
does
not
occur
either
in
AV
or
RV
of
the
OT,
and
has
rightly
been
expunged
from
the
RV
of
Ro
4°-
s,
Gal
4'°,
where
alone
it
had
place
in
the
AV
of
the
NT.
'
Blessed
'
and
'
happy
'
are
found
in
both
Testaments
as
a
varying
translation
of
the
same
Heb.
or
Gr.
word;
'blessed'
greatly
pre-ponderating.
The
Biblical
blessedness
represents
a
conception
of
happiness
in
which
the
religious
relation
is
taken
into
account,
with
its
emotions
and
its
issues.
In
the
OT
these
issues
sometimes
lie
rather
in
material
prosperity
—
life,
long
life,
wealth,
children,
outward
peace
—
but
it
is
recognized
that
the
conditions
of
these
are
spiritual
(Ps
1),
and
in
not
a
few
instances
the
inward
and
spiritual
is
itself
represented
as
the
content
BOCCAS
of
true
happiness
(e.ff.
Ps
32
[but
see
v.'»],
Pr
4'
[but
see
33-
i°l).
In
the
NT
the
stress
is
decisively
shifted
to
the
spiritual
content
of
blessedness,
which
may
consist
with
the
most
adverse
earthly
conditions
(Mt
S'°-
",
Lk
6«,
Ja
I").
The
thought
of
compensation
in
future
reward
is
not
absent,
even
from
the
'Beatitudes'
(esp.
in
their
Lukan
form,
Lk
62°-2°);
but
the
reward
is
clearly
only
the
consummation
of
a
blessedness
already
attained
by
the
poor
in
spirit,
the
meek,
the
merciful,
etc.
In
the
teaching
ot
Jesus
the
summum
ionum
appears
now
as
place
in
the
Kingdom
of
God,
now
as
eternal
life
(e.g.
Mt
25*1,
Mk
10"-
^,
Jn
33-°
4"),
and
both
are
described
as
a
present
possession
(Lk
172»-
21,
Jn
33°).
Finally,
in
the
Johannine
writings
the
religious
relation,
already
in
the
OT
an
essential
condition
of
blessedness
(e.g.
Ps
2'^
33'^),
is
made
supreme
and
in
itself
aU-sufBcing.
Eternal
life
is
personal
union
with
Christ,
revealer
of
the
Father,
by
trust
and
fellowship
(e.g.
Jn
S^
6"
173,
i
jn
511-2°).
For
so
man
becomes
partaker
of
the
life
of
Him
who
is
Himself
the
'
blessed
God'
(1
Tl
1"
61').
S.
W.
Geeen.
BLESSING.—
See
Beatitudes.
BLINDNESS.—
See
Medicine.
BLOOD.
—
Among
all
primitive
races
the
blood,
especially
of
human
beings,
has
been
and
is
regarded
with
superstitious,
or
rather,
to
be
just,
religious
awe.
By
the
Hebrews
also
blood
was
Invested
with
peculiar
sanctity
as
the
seat
of
the
soul
(nephesh),
that
is
of
the
principle
of
life
(Lv
17"
'
the
life
[Heb.
nephesh]
of
the
flesh
is
in
the
blood').
From
this
fundamental
con-ception
of
blood
as
the
vehicle
of
life
may
be
derived
all
the
manifold
social
and
religious
beliefs
and
practices
with
regard
to
it,
which
play
so
large
a
part
in
Scripture.
See
Atonement,
Clean
and
Unclean,
Covenant,
Food,
Propitiation,
Sacrifice.
A.
R.
S.
Kennedy.
BLOOD,
AVENGER
OF.—
See
Avenger
of
Blood,
and
Kin
[Next
of].
BLOOD,
FIELD
OF.—
See
Akeldama.
BLOOD,
ISSUE
OF.—
See
Medicine.
BLOODY
FLUX,
BLOODY
SWEAT.—
See
Medicine.
BLUE.
—
See
Colours,
5.
BOANERGES
(Mk
3"),
'Sons
of
Thunder.'—
The
Master's
appellation
of
James
and
John.
Jerome
takes
it
as
a
reference
to
their
fiery
eloquence.
Others
derive
it
rather
from
their
fiery
disposition
in
early
days
(cf
.
Lk
952-68).
It
would
thus
be
a
playful
yet
serious
sobriquet,
constantly
reminding
them
of
their
besetting
sin
and
warning
them
to
overcome
it.
David
Smith.
BOAR.
—
The
wild
boar
(Arab,
khanzir)
is
quite
common
in
the
Jordan
Valley,
specially
in
the
reed
thickets
near
the
Dead
Sea.
It
is
also
found
on
Mount
Tabor.
It
is
still
noted
for
its
destructiveness
(Ps
80'°).
Though
a
forbidden
food
to
the
Moslem
as
well
as
the
Jew
(Lv
11',
Dt
148),
the
flesh
is
eaten
by
the
nominally
Moslem
Bedouin
of
Palestine.
See
Swine.
E.
W.
G.
Mastekman.
BOAT.
—
See
Ships
and
Boats.
BOAZ.
—
A
Bethlehemite
of
wealth,
the
son
of
Sal-mon;
grandfather
of
Jesse,
and
thus
ancestor
of
David
(Ru
421-
M,
1
Ch
2",
Mt
1°-
°,
Lk
332).
He
became
the
second
husband
of
the
widowed
Ruth,
whom
he
married
(according
to
ancient
Hebrew
custom)
as
next-of-kin,
when
her
'near
kinsman'
refused
to
undertake
this
duty
(Ru
41-'°).
See
Ruth.
W.
O.
E.
Oesterley.
BOAZ,
the
name
of
one
of
the
two
bronze
pillars
which
stood
in
front
ot
Solomon's
Temple.
The
other
was
named
Jachin
(1
K
721,
2
Ch
3").
See
Jachin
and
Boaz,
Temple.
BOCCAS.—
See
Borith.