˟

Dictionary of the Bible

605

 
Image of page 0626

MEDICINE

case of a female child. Nursing continued for 2 or 3 years (2 Mac 7"), and in 1 K ll^" a child is taken by a relative to wean.

The legislation for the menstrual period and tor menorrhagia is given in Lv 15"^-. A rigid purification was prescribed, including everything which the woman had touched, and everybody who touched her or any of those things (see Clean and Unclean). Menorrhagia (EV issue of blood) was considered peculiarly impossible of treatment (Mt 9">, Mk 5™, Lk 8"), and magical means were resorted to for its cure. In Ezk 16* is a description of an infant with undivided umbilical cord, neither washed nor dressed. The skin of infants was usually dressed with salt to make it firm. The meta-phorical use of terms derived from child-labour is ex-ceedingly common in the Bible.

Infantile diseases seem to have been very severe in Palestine in Bible times, as at the present day. We hear of sick children in 2 S 12i6, i K 17", and Christ healed many children.

Among cases of unspecified diseases may be men-tioned those of Abijah (1 K 14i), Benhadad (2 K 8'), EUsha (2 K 13"), Joash (2 Ch 242*), Lazarus (Jn 11'), Dorcas (Ac 9"), Epaphroditus (Ph ^")_ Trophimus (2Ti420).

4. Methods of treatment. The Bible gives us very few references on this point. We hear of washing (2 K 5'"); diet perhaps (Lk 8"); the application of saliva (Ju 9'); unction (Ja 5"); the binding of wounds and the application of soothing ointment (Is 1'); the use of oil and wine for wounds (Lk lO**); a plaster of figs for a boil (Is 38"); animal heat by contact (1 K 1^ 1721, 2 K 4M).

Balm of Gilead or balm is mentioned in Gn 372= 43U, Jer S^ 46" 51«, Ezk 27". It appears to be re-garded as a sedative application, and was probably an aromatic gum or spice (see art. Balm).

Mandrakes (Mandragora offlcinalis) were used as a stimulant to conception (Gn 30"), and the fruit as a medicine. Mint (.MetUha silvestris), anise (Anethum graveolens), cummin iCuminum sativum) were used as carminatives; salt for hardening the skin, nitre (Jer 2*2) to cleanse it. The caper-berry (Capparis spinosa) is mentioned in Ec 12*; it was regarded as an aphro-disiac. The wine offered to Christ at His crucifixion was probably intended as a narcotic (Mt 2T*- ", Mk 1523- », Lk 23"', Jn ig^'). Most of the remedies were dietary in the Jewish as in the Egyptian pharmacopoeia, e.g. meal, milk, vinegar, wine, water, almonds, figs, raisins, pomegranates, honey, etc.

We have a mention of amulets in Is 3™ and perhaps Gn 36*. The apothecary's art is mentioned in Ex 3025-35 3729_ Ec 10', 2 Ch 16", Neh 38, Sir 38» 49>. But in all these passages the reference is to makers of perfumes rather than compounders of medicines. It is probable that medicines were compounded by those who prescribed them.

Hygienic enactments dealing with food, sanitation, and infectious diseases are common in the Levitical Code. With regard to food, herbivorous ruminant animals were permitted to be eaten; all true fishes also were allowed; but birds which lived on animal food were for-bidden, and aU invertebrates except locusts. The fat and the blood of animals were prohibited as food, and regulations were given for the inspection of animals slaughtered for eating. The origin, however, of many of these regulations probably hes in primitive taboo laws (see Clean and Unclean). Fruits could not be used for food until the tree had been planted for four years (Lv 192»-25). The provisions repeated in Ex 12" 13', Dt 16' for the periodic destruction of leaven, what-ever their historical origin, must have been of service for the maintenance of pure bread-stuffs.

The agricultural sanitary laws are directed chiefly to prohibit the mixing of different species, e.g. the sowing of different seeds in a field at the same time, the cross-

MEEKNESS

grafting of fruit-trees, the cross-breeding or yoking to-gether of dissimilar cattle. And periodic rest for man and beast was preicribed. No mixture of hnen and woollen materials in garments was permitted (Lv 19", Dt 22"), as such garments cannot be so easily or thoroughly cleansed as those of one material. There were also various regulations as to domestic sanitation; thus the covering with earth of excreta and of blood was ordered; possibly the fires of the Valley of Hinnom were intended to consume the offal of the city. Houses were to be built with parapets to prevent accident (Dt 22»). Isolation in suspected cases of infectious disease was prescribed (Lv 13*), and the washing of body and clothes (Nu 19") was obligatory on those who had touched unclean things.

f Uncleanness was in many cases merely ceremonial in nature. But the regulations must often have served to diminish the chances of propagating real infection. Various grades of uncleanness are recognized in the Talmud, and different periods of lustration and isolation were ordained, in accordance with the different grade of uncleanness contracted.

5. Surgical instruments. A fiint knife was used for circumcision (Jos 5'), but in later times steel knives were employed. An awl for boring the ear is men-tioned in Ex 21«.

The most important surgical operation was the performance of circumcision. Its original idea may have been that of imposing a tribal mark on the infant (unless it was at first performed in early manhood and subsequently transferred to the time of infancy); but it came to be regarded as ^.n operation of purification. The exclusion of eimuchs from the service of God (Dt 23>) may have been due to the dread of importing heathen rites into Israel. But they were important officials in the time of the kingdom, as in Oriental courts generally (1 K 22», 2 K 24", Jer 29^ 34" 38' 41i»), and there were eunuchs at the court of the Herods, as elsewhere (cf. Ac 8^'). The passage in Is 56* implies that eunuchs were then under no special religious disabiUty; cf. also our Lord's reference in Mt 19"'.

Of course we must admit that in many cases the use of remedies, the sanitary laws, the prescriptions as to food, the regulations as to uncleanness, and so forth, did not necessarily originate in any theory as to their value for the preservation of pubUc health. Primitive taboo customs, folk-lore, magic, superstition, are no doubt responsible for the existence of much that has been here placed under the heading of medicine. And it is quite hkely, too, that up to a late period the popular Jewish view of the majority of these rules and customs was enlightened by no very clear conception of their hygienic value. The more educated minds of tne nation may possibly in time have come to see that enactments which had originated in crude or mistaken notions of religion might yet be preserved, and valued as important precautions for the prevention of disease and its cure. ' But it may be doubted whether, even in late times, the vulgar opinion about them was at all sdentiflc. At the same time, it is necessary to recognize tiat tflany of the laws, begotten, perhaps, of primitive superstition, did nevertheless serve a medical purpose, and so may without untruthfulness be included in a treatment of Bible medicine. A. W. F. Bltjnt.

MEEDDA (1 Es 5'^) =.Mehida, Ezr 2=2, Neh 7".

MEEKNESS. In the eariier literature of revelation meekness is simply an excellent virtue. Moses is de-scribed as 'very meek,' above all the men which were upon the face of the'earth' (Nu 12"), and his character illustrates the Hebfew ideal of meekness in those days. There was no weakness or cowardice about him. He was 'a still, strong man,' patient and pitiful. Subsequently the word acquired a peculiar significance. In the days of Israel's conflict the men of pride and violence came to the front, while the godly were thrust into the background.

601