MEGIDDO
contenmed
and
oppressed
(cf.
Ps
lO^-
»-i»).
Thus
'rich'
and
'wicked'
came
to
be
synonymous
(Is
53');
and
corresponding
to
these
there
was
a
group
of
terms:
•meek,'
'humble'
(or
'lowly'),
'poor,'
'needy.'
In
our
Lord's
time
these
terms
denoted
the
godly
remnant
in
Israel,
those
who,
despised
by
the
rulers,
lived
devout
lives
in
obscure
corners,
nourishing
their
faith
on
the
Scriptures,
and
'waiting
for
the
consolation
of
Israel'
(Lk
2'»-
^'),
the
blessed
Advent
of
the
Messiah.
And,
just
as
the
Psalmists
and
Prophets
had
sympathized
with
the
Lord's
hidden
ones
and
promised
them
deliverance
(Ps
9'2-
"
lO'2-'8
37"
[cf.
Mt
5']
722-
S
Is
11<),
so
Jesus
was
their
champion.
He
called
them
'blessed'
(Mt
S'-'i'),
and
He
took
His
place
by
their
side.
Himself
'meek
and
lowly'
(Mt
11™),
the
homeless
Son
of
Man,
despised
and
rejected
of
men.
He
shared
their
humility
that
they
might
share
His
glory.
David
Smith.
MEGIDDO
(in
Zee
12"
Megiddon).
—
One
of
the
most
important
of
the
fortress
cities
of
ancient
Canaan.
It
was
captured
by
Thothmes
iii
in
the
23rd
year
of
his
reign,
the
spoils
being
magnificent;
and
it
is
mentioned
several
times
in
the
Tell
el-Amarna
corre-spondence.
Though
nominally
belonging
to
Manasseh
(Jos
1712-
IS,
Jg
12'-
28),
the
Canaanites
remained
in
possession.
Near
the
'waters
of
Megiddo'
the
Canaanites
under
Sisera
were
defeated
by
Barak
and
Deborah
(Jg
S's-^O.
Solomon
restored
its
fortifica-tions
(1
K
9").
Here
king
Ahaziah
(2
K
9")
died;
and
the
good
king
Josiah,
interfering
In
a
quarrel
between
Pharaoh-necho
and
the
king
of
Assyria,
and
opposing
the
former's
progress
in
the
dangerous
passage
of
Megiddo,
was
also
slain
(2
K
23"-
™,
2
Ch
SS^^),
to
the
grief
of
all
Israel
(Zee
12").
Finally,
it
was
at
Armageddon
(RV
Har-Magedon,
'
the
mountains
of
Megiddo')
that
the
mysterious
conflict
of
Rev
16i»
was
to
take
place.
The
site
of
Megiddo
may
now
be
considered
as
proved
to
be
Tell
el-Mutesellim
('Hill
of
the
Governor'),
a
great
mound
about
4
miles
N.W.
of
Tell
Ta'annak
(Taanach;
cf.
Jos
12»
17",
Jg
S"
etc.).
The
importance
of
the
site
can
be
seen
at
a
glance,
for
it
guards
the
great
pass
from
the
Plain
of
Sharon
to
that
of
Esdraelon,
which
in
aU
history,
from
Thothmes
iii.
to
Napoleon
i.,
has
been
a
route
of
armies.
The
hill
has
recently
been
excavated
by
the
German
Palestine
Society,
and
forti-fications
going
back
bef
ore
b.c.
2000
have
been
uncovered,
as
well
as
the
most
extensive
remains
of
successive
cities
which
have
occupied
this
site
for
many
centuries.
Here
was
found
the
seal
of
Shama',
'the
servant
of
Jeroboam'
—
probably
Jeroboam
ii.
To
the
south
of
the
tell
is
an
abundant
stream,
and
in
Roman
times
a
fortified
post
—
the
Legio
of
Eusebius,
the
modem
eU
Lejjun
—
was
estabUshed
there.
The
stream
may
have
been
the
'waters
of
Megiddo'
of
Jg
5"
etc.;
it
is
one
of
the
most
important
of
the
tributaries
of
the
Kishon.
E.
W.
G.
Masterman.
MEGILLOTH.—
See
Canon
of
OT,
§
8.
MEHETABEL.
—
1.
The
grandfather
of
Shemaiah
(Neh
6'»).
2.
The
wife
of
Hadar
or
Hadad,
king
of
Edom
(Gn
363»,
1
Ch
l*").
MEHIDA.
—
The
eponymof
a
family
of
Nethinimwho
returned
with
Zerub.
(Ezr
2'2=Neh
7"),
called
in
1
Es
S32
Meedda.
MEHIR.—
A
Judahite
(1
Ch
4").
MEHOLATHITE
(1
S
IS",
2
S
218).—
Probably
an
inhabitant
of
Abel-mebolah
(wh.
see).
MEHUJAEL.
—
A
Cainite
(Gn
4'8)
(j),
corresponding
to
Mahalalel
of
P's
genealogy
(Gn
6'™).
MEHUHAN
.
—
One
of
the
seven
eunuchs
in
attendance
upon
king
Ahasuerus
(Est
l").
ME-JABKON
(Jos
19").—
The
Heb.
text
seems
to
be
in
disorder.
The
LXX
reading,
'and
from
the
sea,
Jarkon
and
the
boundary
near
Joppa,'
sufhciently
MELCHIZEDEK
attests
the
name
Jarkon,
a
place
in
the
territory
of
Dan;
but
the
site
is
not
yet
recovered.
W.
Ewing.
mEKONAH
(AV;
RV
needlessly
changes
toMeconah),
—
A
town
inhabited
after
the
Captivity
(Neh
ll^s).
The
site
has
not
been
identified.
MELATIAH.—
A
Gibeonite
(Neh
30.
MELCHI.
—
1.
2.
Two
ancestors
of
Jesus
(Lk
3M-
28).
MELCHIAS.—
1.
1
Es
9M
=Malchijah,
Ezr
102«.
2.
1
Es
982
=Malchijah,
Ezr
IQsi.
3.
1
Es
9"
=
Malchijah,
Neh
8K
MELCHIEL.—
The
father
of
Charmis
(Jth
6'5).
MELCHIZEDEK.
—
Described
as
king
of
Salem
and
priest
of
God
Most
High
('Bl
'Elyon),
who
met
Abraham
on
his
return
from
the
slaughter
of
Chedorlaomer
and
his
allies,
refreshed
him
and
his
servants
with
bread
and
wine,
blessed
him,
and
received
from
him
a
tenth
of
the
spoil
he
had
taken
(Gn
I418-20).
Salem
has
been
variously
identified:
(1)
with
the
Shalem
of
Gn
33'«
(AV
and
RVm),
a
place
a
little
to
the
E.
of
Mt.
Gerizim
and
not
far
from
Shechem;
(2)
with
the
Salim
of
Jn
3^
in
the
Jordan
Valley
S.
of
Scythopolis;
and
(3)
with
Jerusalem,
which
is
called
Salem
in
Ps
76^.
The
last
identification
is
much
the
most
probable;
for
though
it
is
implied
in
Jos
158-
83^
Jg
1910
that
Jerusalem
was
called
Jebus
so
long
as
it
was
inhabited
by
the
Jebusites
(i.e.
up
to
the
time
of
David),
the
name
Jerusalem
really
goes
back
to
the
14th
cent.
B.C.,
since
it
appears
in
the
Tell
el-Amarna
tablets
as
UrU'Salim.
This
view
has
the
sup-port
of
Josephus
(Ant.
i.
x.
2),
and
further
obtains
some
sUght
confirmation
from
the
resemblance
of
the
name
cf
Melchizedek
to
that
of
Adonizedek,
who
was
king
of
Jerusalem
in
the
time
of
Joshua
(Jos
108),
the
element
zedek
in
each
name
being
probably
that
of
a
Canaanite
deity.
The
historical
character
of
the
narrative
in
-which
Mel-chizedek
is
mentioned
has
been
questioned
on
the
ground
of
certain
improbabilities
which
it
contains;
but
though
the
events
related
have
received
no
corroboration
from
other
sources,
the
names
of
two
of
the
kings
who
fought
against
Abraham,
viz
.
Amraphel
and
Arioch,
have
with
some
tlausibility
been
identified
with
those
of
Hammurabi
and
Iriaku,
contemporary
kings
of
Babylon
and
Larsa
about
B.C.
2200;
so
that,
if
the
identiiication
is
correct,
it
confirms
the
setting
of
the
story,
though
not
its
incidente.
For
the
name
and
personality
of
Melchizedek
no
independent
con-firmatory
evidence
has
yet
been
obtained.
In
Ps
110*,
to
the
ideal
king
of
Jewish
hopes,
the
Messiah,
there
is
promised
an
endless
priesthood
'
after
the
order
of
Melchizedek.'
This
ascription
of
priestly
functions
to
a
sovereign
who
was
expected
to
be
of
the
house
of
David
and
the
tribe
of
Judah
is
evidently
meant
as
an
exceptional
distinction,
and
implies
that
the
writer
lived
at
a
time
when
priests
in
Israel
were
taken
exclusively
from
the
tribe
of
Levi,
as
was
the
case
after
the
promulgation
of
the
Deuteronomic
law
(probably
in
the
7th
cent.).
At
an
earlier
date
persons
belonging
to
other
tribes
than
that
of
Levi
were
some-times
priests:
David's
sons
(2
S
S's);
and
Ira
the
Jairite
(2028),
-sfho
belonged
to
Manasseh
(Nu
32");
but
the
author
of
Ps
1
10,
in
seeking
a
type
tor
the
combination
in
the
same
person
of
both
the
regal
and
priestly
offices,
had
to
go
outside
the
limits
of
Israel,
and
found
what
he
wanted
in
the
priest-king
of
Salem,
who
was
all
the
more
adapted
for
the
purpose
by
reason
of
the
deference
paid
to
him
by
so
illustrious
a
personage
as
Abraham.
The
writer
of
the
Epistle
to
the
Hebrews,
identifying
Jesus
with
the
Messiah,
and
asserting
His
high
priesthood,
cites
the
words
of
Ps
110,
and
declares
that
He
was
'named
of
God
a
high
priest
after
the
order
of
Melchiz-edek'
(He
6'8).
He
then
proceeds
to
show
the
superi-ority
of
Christ's
priesthood
over
that
of
the
Jewish
priests,
the
descendants
of
Aaron,
and
seeks
to
illustrate
it
by
the
superiority
of
Melchizedek
over
Abraham,
as
he
gathers
it
from
Gn
14.
He
explains
Melchizedek'a
name
to
mean
'king
of
righteousness,'
and
his
title
of
'king
of
Salem'
to
mean
'king
of
peace';
and
then.