TIGRIS
B.C.
734
the
Assyrian
army
invaded
Pillshta
(Pliilistia)
—
according
to
Rost,
tlie
Mediterranean
coastland
S.
ol
Joppa.
Gaza
wag
captured,
and
Hanun,
tlie
Icing,
having
fled,
Tiglath-pileser
mounted
the
throne
and
set
up
his
image
in
the
palace
there.
In
b.c.
733
came
the
turn
of
Damascus
and
also
of
Israel,
the
Immediate
cause
being
affairs
in
Judah.
Azariah
had
died,
and
after
the
short
reign
of
his
son
Jotham,
Jehoahaz
or
Ahaz
came
to
the
throne.
Taking
advantage
of
the
change,
Pelcah
of
Israel
made
an
alliance
with
Rezin
of
Damascus
to
attack
Judah,
and
captured
Elath
(2
K
lefi").
Feeling
that
Judah
would
be
compelled
to
submit
to
the
allied
powers
in
the
end,
Ahaz
turned
to
Assyria,
sending
the
best
of
his
own
treasures
and
those
of
the
Temple
at
Jerusalem
to
make
a
worthy
present
to
the
Assyrian
king
(2
K
le*),
who
therefore
came
to
his
aid.
Pekah
and
Rezin
withdrew
their
forces
from
Judah,
but,
instead
of
uniting
against
the
common
foe,
awaited
the
Assyrian
king's
attack
each
in
his
own
territory.
Marching
by
the
coast-route,
Tiglath-pileser
assured
himself
of
the
submission
of
his
vassals
in
N.
Phoenicia,
and
attacked
N.
Israel,
capturing
Ijon,
Abel-beth-maacah,
Janoah,
Kedesh,
Hazor,
Gilead,
Galilee,
and
all
the
land
of
Naphtali
(2
K
IS^').
These
names
are
not
preserved
in
the
annals,
though
'the
broad
(land
of)
.
.
.
-li'
may
be,
as
Hommel
suggests,
the
last
named.
Pekah
saved
his
land
from
further
harm
by
paying
tribute,
but
things
went
harder
with
Rezin,
his
ally,
who
shut
himself
up
in
Damascus.
The
siege
which
followed
ended,
in
732,
in
the
capture
of
the
city;
591
towns,
including
Hadara,
Rezin's
own
city,
were
razed
to
the
ground.
An
attack
upon
Samsi,
queen
of
the
Arabians,
followed,
the
result
being
that
a
number
of
tribes
—
Sabaeans,
Mas'seans,
etc.,
—
hastened
to
propitiate
the
Assyrian
king
with
gifts.
Idi-bi'il,
a
N.
Arabian
prince,
was
made
governor
on
the
Musrian
border.
Meanwhile
a
number
of
Israelitish
nobles,
with
Hoshea
as
leader,
revolted,
and
Pekah
fled,
but
seems
to
have
been
murdered.
Hoshea
thereupon
mounted
the
throne,
and
bought
the
recognition
of
the
Assyrian
king,
who
had
continued
to
ravage
Syria.
Mitinti
of
Ashkelon,
seeing
the
fate
of
Rezin
of
Damascus,
seems
to
have
gone
mad.
He
was
succeeded
by
his
son
RQkipti,
who
tried
to
atone
for
his
father's
dis-affection
by
sending
tribute
and
gifts.
Metenna
of
Tyre
likewise
became
tributary.
After
the
fall
of
the
capital,
Damascus
became
an
Assyrian
province.
According
to
2
K
16',
the
people
were
taken
captive
to
Kir,
and
Rezin
was
slain.
It
was
in
Damascus
that
Ahaz
made
homage
to
the
conqueror,
and
seeing
there
an
altar
which
took
his
fancy,
had
one
made
like
it.
Tiglath-pileser,
confident,
seemingly,
of
his
hold
upon
Palestine,
did
not
again
invade
the
country.
Its
States
remained
for
many
years
more
or
less
tributary
to
Assyria,
accord-ing
as
that
power
seemed
strong
or
weak.
In
B.C.
731
Tiglath-pileser
was
attracted
by
events
in
Babylonia.
Ukin-zgr,
a
Chaldaean
prince,
having
seized
the
Baby-lonian
throne,
the
Assyrian
king
besieged
him
in
his
capital
Sapia,
which
he
captured
in
b.c.
729,
taking
Ukin-zBr
prisoner.
In
b.c.
728
Tiglath-pileser
became
king
of
Babylon,
but
beyond
'grasping
the
hand
of
Bel'
(Merodach)
as
its
ruler,
took
part
in
no
further
Important
event.
He
probably
died
when
making
an
expedition
against
a
city
whose
name
is
lost;
and
Shalmaneser
iv.
mounted
the
throne
(25th
of
Tebeth,
B.C.
727).
When
at
home,
Tiglath-pileser
resided
in
Nineveh
or
in
Calah,
where
he
restored
the
central
palace
in
Hittite
style,
decorating
it
with
bas-reliefs
and
the
annals
of
his
reign.
This
building
was
partly
destroyed
by
Esarhaddon.
T.
G.
Pinches.
TIGRIS.—
Only
In
RVm
of
Gn
2"
and
Dn
1(H,
where
both
AV
and
RV
have
Hiddekel
(wh.
see).
The
Tigris
rises
a
little
S.
of
Lake
GOljik
and
flows
southward
to
Diarbekr.
After
passing
Diarbekr
it
receives
the
eastern
Tigris
(which
rises
in
the
Niphates
mountains)
TIME
at
Osman
Kieui.
Then
it
flows
through
narrow
gorges
Into
the
plateau
of
Mesopotamia,
where
it
receives
from
the
east
the
Greater
and
Lesser
Zab,
the
Adhem
or
Radanu,
and
the
Diyaleh
or
Tornadotus.
On
the
E.
bank,
opposite
Mosul,
were
Nineveh
and
Calah,
a
little
N.
of
the
junction
of
the
Tigris
and
Greater
Zab;
and
on
the
W.
bank,
N.
of
the
Lesser
Zab,
was
Assur
(now
Kalah
Sherghat),
the
primitive
capital
of
Assyria.
■The
Tigris
is
about
1150
miles
in
length,
and
rises
rapidly
in
March
and
April
owing
to
the
melting
of
the
snows,
falUng
again
after
the
middle
of
May.
Cf.
also
Eden
[Gaeden
of].
TIKVAH.—
1.
The
father-in-law
of
Huldah
(2
K
22")
;
called
in
2
Ch
34k
Tokhath.
2.
The
father
of
Jahzeiah
(Ezr
10");
called
in
1
Es
9"
Thocanus.
TILE,
TILING.—
The
former
occurs
only
in
Ezk
4'
for
'brick'
—
the
usual
rendering
of
the
original.
For
plans
of
a
city
drawn
on
'
bricks
'
or
'
tablets
'
of
soft
clay,
which
were
afterwards
baked
hard,
see
'Ezekiel,'
in
SBOT,
in
loc.
'Tiling'
is
found
only
in
Lk
5"
AV,
for
which
RV
has
'through
the
tUes.'
St.
Luke
seems
here
to
have
adapted
the
narrative
of
Mk.
(for
which
see
House,
§
6)
to
the
style
of
roof
covered
with
tiles
(see
'Tegula'
in
Rich's
Diet,
of
Antiq.),
with
which
his
Western
readers
were
more
familiar;
or
'through
the
tiles'
is
here
simply
synonymous
with
'through
the
roof
(cf.
our
expression
'on
the
tiles').
A.
R.
S.
Kennedy.
TILGATH-PILNESER.-
SeeTiQLATH-PiLESEH.
"TILON.—
A
son
of
Shimon
(1
Ch
4™).
TDlffilUS.-
Father
of
Bartimaeus
(Mk
10«).
TIMBREL.—
See
Tabbet,
and
Music,
etc.,
4
(3)
(a).
TIME.
—
The
conception
that
we
seem
to
gather
of
time
from
the
Holy
Scriptures
is
of
a
small
block,
as
it
were,
cut
out
of
boundless
eternity.
Of
past
eternity,
if
we
may
use
such
an
expression,
God
is
the
only
inhabi-tant;
in
future
eternity
angels
and
men
are
to
share.
And
this
'block'
of
time
is
infinitesimally
small.
In
God's
sight,
in
the
Divine
mind,
'a
thousand
years
are
but
as
yesterday'
(Ps
90';
cf.
2
P
3*
'one
day
is
with
the
Lord
as
a
thousand
years,
and
a
thousand
years
as
one
day').
Time
has
a
beginning;
it
has
also,
if
we
accept
the
usual
translation
of
Rev
10'
'there
shall
be
time
no
longer,'
a
stated
end.
The
word
'time
'in
Biblical
apocalyptic
literature
has
another
meaning
—
'time'
stands
for
'a
year'
both
in
Daniel
(4"-
»•
"■
»2
T^,
where
the
plural
'times'
seems
to
stand
for
two
years)
and
in
Rev
12"
(derived
from
Dn
7^).
When
once
the
idea
of
time
formed
itself
in
the
human
mind,
subdivisions
of
it
would
follow
as
a
matter
of
course.
The
division
between
light
and
darkness,
the
rising,
the
zenith,
and
the
setting
of
the
sun
and
the
moon,
together
with
the
phases
of
the
latter,
and
the
varying
position
of
the
most
notable
stars
in
the
firma-ment,
would
all
suggest
modes
of
reckoning
time,
to
say
nothing
of
the
circuit
of
the
seasons
as
indicated
by
the
growth
and
development
of
the
fruits
of
the
field
and
agricultural
operations.
Hence
we
find
in
Gn
1
day
and
night
as
the
first
division
of
time,
and,
because
light
was
believed
to
be
a
later
creation
than
matter,
one
whole
day
Is
said
to
be
made
up
of
evening
and
morning;
and
the
day
is
reckoned,
as
it
still
is
by
the
Jews
and,
in
principle,
by
the
Church
In
her
ecclesiastical
feasts,
from
one
disappearance
of
the
sun
to
the
next,
the
divisions
between
day
and
night
being
formed
by
that
appearance
and
disappearance.
In
this
same
cosmogony
we
meet
with
a
further
use
of
the
lights
in
the
firmament
of
heaven;
they
are
to
be
"for
signs,
and
for
seasons,
and
for
days
and
years'
(Gn
1").
The
day
would
thus
be
an
obvious
division
of
time
for
intelligent
beings
to
make
from
the
very
earliest
ages.
As
time
went
on,
subdivisions
of
this
day
would
be
made,
derived
from
an
observance
of
the
sun
in
the
heavens
—
morning,